首页> 外文OA文献 >A Fair Share : Burden-Sharing Preferences in the United States and China
【2h】

A Fair Share : Burden-Sharing Preferences in the United States and China

机译:公平分享:美国和中国的负担分享偏好

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using a choice experiment, we investigated preferences for distributing the economicburden of decreasing CO2 emissions in the two largest CO2-emitting countries: the UnitedStates and China. We asked respondents about their preferences for four burden-sharing rulesto reduce CO2 emissions according to their country’s 1) historical emissions, 2) income level,3) equal right to emit per person, and 4) current emissions. We found that U.S. respondentspreferred the rule based on current emissions, while the equal right to emit rule was clearlyleast preferred. The Chinese respondents, on the other hand, preferred the historical rule,while the current emissions rule was the least preferred. Respondents overall favored the rulethat was least costly for their country. These marked differences may explain the difficultiescountries face in agreeing how to share costs, presenting a tough hurdle to overcome in futurenegotiations. We also found that the strength of the preferences was much stronger in China,suggesting that how mitigation costs are shared across countries is more important there.
机译:通过选择实验,我们调查了在两个最大的二氧化碳排放国(美国和中国)中分配减少二氧化碳排放的经济负担的偏好。我们向受访者询问了他们希望采用四种负担分担规则以根据其国家的1)历史排放量,2)收入水平,3)人均排放权和4)当前排放量来减少CO2排放的偏好。我们发现,美国受访者更喜欢基于当前排放量的规则,而平等的排放权显然是最不受欢迎的。另一方面,中国受访者更喜欢历史规则,而目前的排放规则则是最不喜欢的规则。总体而言,受访者青睐该国成本最低的规则。这些明显的差异可能解释了各国在商定如何分摊成本方面面临的困难,为将来的谈判提出了艰巨的障碍。我们还发现,在中国,优惠政策的优势要强得多,这表明,如何在各国之间分担减排成本更为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号