首页> 外文OA文献 >'Ruled by abstractions': Abstract labour, and the labour of abstraction in Marx’s critique of political economy
【2h】

'Ruled by abstractions': Abstract labour, and the labour of abstraction in Marx’s critique of political economy

机译:“抽象的统治”:抽象的劳动,以及马克思对政治经济学的批判中的抽象劳动

摘要

In his Grundrisse manuscripts from 1857, Karl Marx (1818–1883) writes that individuals in the bourgeois society are ”von Abstraktionen beherrscht” – ruled by abstractions. In Das Kapital from 1867 Marx writes that for the analysis of economic forms our only available tool is ”Abstraktionskraft” – the force of abstraction. How are these two notions of abstraction to be understood and related? Taking its point of departure in the category abstract labour, this thesis reconstructs the premises for Marx’s theory and situates his critique of political economy in its historical and scientific context, primarily in relation to Ricardo and Hegel. Marxian scholarship is divided over Marx’s notion of abstract labour with one side stressing the abstraction of labour as the reduction of human labour to the expenditure of labour power in its physiological sense, and the other side stressing the purely social character of the abstract labour constituting commodities as objects of value. Within the latter camp it is commonly argued that Marx’s understanding of abstract labour is nevertheless ambivalent, if not inconsistent, and that two definitions of abstract labour can be found in the text of Das Kapital: one social and one physiological. The implication of this analysis is that Marx’s critique, and overthrow, of political economy is incomplete. By way of textual analysis of Das Kapital and related manuscripts, drafts, and letters, this thesis reconstructs the premises for Marx’s method, while showing how even though inconsistencies are to be found in Marx’s textual corpus, the category of abstract labour is not one of those instances; his critique and overthrow of political economy is essentially consistent. This thesis argues that abstract labour is a purely social form and that Marx’s ’physiological definition’ is but one moment of the determination of this category. Abstract labour as the social essence of value and capital is to be considered as a determinate abstraction pertaining only in capitalist relations. The physicalist abstraction in its turn constitutes a general abstraction to be found in human social existence per se. As the abstract social substance of value, abstract labour constitutes a Realabstraktion, dominating individuals in bourgeois society.
机译:卡尔·马克思(1818–1883)在其1857年的《 grundrisse》手稿中写道,资产阶级社会中的个体是“冯·阿伯斯特拉金丁·贝赫尔施特”(von Abstraktionen beherrscht),受抽象统治。马克思在1867年的《资本论》中写道,对于经济形式的分析,我们唯一可用的工具是“抽象的力量”。这两个抽象概念如何理解和关联?本文以抽象劳动为出发点,重新建构了马克思理论的前提,并将其对政治经济学的批评置于其历史和科学背景下,主要是与里卡多和黑格尔有关。马克思主义学术界对马克思的抽象劳动有不同的看法,一方面强调劳动的抽象,即从生理意义上将人类劳动减少为劳动力的支出,另一方面强调劳动构成商品的抽象劳动的纯粹社会性作为有价值的对象。在后一个阵营中,通常认为,马克思对抽象劳动的理解是矛盾的,即使不是不一致的,在《资本论》中可以找到两种抽象劳动的定义:一种是社会的,一种是生理的。这种分析的含义是,马克思对政治经济学的批评和推翻是不完整的。通过对《资本论》及相关手稿,草案和信件的文本分析,本文重构了马克思方法的前提,同时表明,即使在马克思的文本语料库中发现不一致之处,抽象劳动的类别也不是其中之一。这些实例;他对政治经济学的批评和推翻本质上是一致的。本文认为,抽象劳动是一种纯粹的社会形式,马克思的“生理定义”只是确定这一类别的一刻。抽象劳动是价值和资本的社会本质,应被视为仅与资本主义关系有关的确定的抽象。物理抽象又反过来构成了在人类社会存在本身中发现的一般抽象。作为价值的抽象社会实质,抽象劳动构成了资产阶级,控制着资产阶级社会中的个人。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jung Henrik;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 swe
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号