• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Brief of Health Care For All, Inc., Health Law Advocates, Inc., The Massachusetts Hospital Association, Inc., The Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, Inc., Greater Boston Interfaith Organization, Inc., and Community Catalyst, Inc. as amici curiae in support of petitioners urging reversal on the minimum coverage provision issue, Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. State of Florida, et al., No. 11-398 (filed Jan. 13, 2012)
【2h】

Brief of Health Care For All, Inc., Health Law Advocates, Inc., The Massachusetts Hospital Association, Inc., The Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, Inc., Greater Boston Interfaith Organization, Inc., and Community Catalyst, Inc. as amici curiae in support of petitioners urging reversal on the minimum coverage provision issue, Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. State of Florida, et al., No. 11-398 (filed Jan. 13, 2012)

机译：Health Care For all，Inc。，Health Law advocates，Inc.，massachusetts Hospital association，Inc.，massachusetts League of Community Health Centers，Inc.，Greater Boston Interfaith Organization，Inc。和Community Catalyst，Inc。简介。作为amici curiae支持请愿者敦促撤销最低覆盖率规定问题，卫生和公共服务部等。 v.of Florida of et al。，No。11-398（2012年1月13日提交）

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This amicus brief was filed before the Supreme Court in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) litigation on behalf of Health Care for All and other Massachusetts organizations that have been involved in the implementation of Massachusettsu27 health 2006 health reform legislation. The brief argues that Massachusettsu27 health reform law, upon which the ACA is modeled, has been very effective in expanding insurance coverage within the State, but it required substantial federal support, through a Medicaid waiver, to achieve its success. In addition the Commonwealthu27s experience illustrates that the health insurance and health care markets are inherently interstate commerce and that decisions by out-of-state residents to forgo insurance, the very decisions subject to the ACAu27s minimum coverage provision, have limited the Stateu27s ability to improve its health care system through the elimination of uncompensated care. The brief reviews the impact of the health care services provided to out-of-state tourists, commuters, and residents on the Stateu27s health care system, and argues that similar or greater externalities would face any state seeking to reform its own health care system. Only the federal government has the power to address these externalities.
机译：该法庭之友陈述书是在全美可负担医疗法案（ACA）诉讼中代表全民医保和参与实施马萨诸塞州2006年健康改革立法的其他马萨诸塞州组织提交给最高法院的。简报认为，以ACA为榜样的马萨诸塞州医疗改革法在扩大州内保险范围方面非常有效，但要获得成功，就需要通过医疗补助豁免获得联邦的大力支持。此外，英联邦的经验还表明，健康保险和医疗保健市场本质上是州际贸易，州外居民放弃保险的决定是ACA最低保险条款的唯一决定，这限制了国家通过消除无偿护理来改善其医疗体系的能力。该简报回顾了向州外游客，通勤者和居民提供的医疗保健服务对本州医疗保健系统的影响，并指出，任何试图改革自己的医疗保健的州都将面临类似或更大的外部性系统。只有联邦政府有权解决这些外部性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号