• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Metaphysics as praxis : Rereading Dōgen's Metaphysics through Deleuzian pragmatism and Pratītyasamutpāda
【2h】

Metaphysics as praxis : Rereading Dōgen's Metaphysics through Deleuzian pragmatism and Pratītyasamutpāda

机译：作为形而上学的形而上学：通过德勒祖实用主义和《真理论》重读多根的形而上学

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This thesis interprets the Japanese Buddhist master, Dōgen's metaphysical ideas concerning Buddha-nature, Total-function, and temporality, with the help of Deleuze's pragmatism, in a manner congruent with the central Buddhist doctrine of pratītyasamutpāda. In doing so, the research attempts to overcome the problems of what I view as the two opposing poles of Dōgen interpretation: that of the Critical Buddhists who deny Dōgen's metaphysics, claiming that it is in-congruent to pratītyasamutpāda, and the “Comparative Philosophers,” who affirms Dōgen's metaphysics yet in a manner that disregards pratītyasamutpāda. The research reconsiders Dōgen's above metaphysical concepts, of which Critical Buddhism and comparative interpretations gives a shortsighted picture inasmuch as they impose upon Dōgen a “representational epistemology.” This error prevents the former interpretations of Dōgen to acknowledge the potential that Dōgen's metaphysical concepts can have a practical use for an ethics centered on pratītyasamutpāda. Deleuze's philosophy, insofar as it is pragmatist and non-representational, can help to elucidate this limitation, and to create a reinterpretation of Dōgen's doctrine on Total-function, time and Buddha-nature to function as tools for spiritual practice in concurrence to pratītyasamutpāda. Ultimately, I claim that Dōgen's metaphysics is not descriptive or explanatory of reality, but are pragmatically functional tools incorporated into spiritual practice.
机译：这篇论文在德勒兹的实用主义的帮助下，以与佛教的中心学说pratītyasamutpāda相一致的方式，阐释了日本佛教大师多根关于佛性，全功能和时间性的形而上学思想。在这种情况下，这项研究试图克服我认为是道根解释的两个对立问题的问题：批判佛教徒否认道根的形而上学，他们认为道根与形而上学是不相称的，而“比较哲学家，他以无视pratītyasamutpāda的方式肯定了Dōgen的形而上学。这项研究重新考虑了多根的上述形而上学概念，其中批判性佛教和比较性解释为多根强加了“代表性认识论”，因此具有近视。这个错误使多根的先前解释无法承认多根的形而上学概念对于以prattytyasamutpāda为中心的伦理学具有实际用途的潜力。德勒兹的哲学，因为它是实用主义的和非代表性的，可以帮助阐明这一局限性，并重新诠释道根关于全功能，时间和佛性的教义，以作为与实践相辅相成的精神实践工具。最终，我声称多根的形而上学不是对现实的描述或解释，而是结合到精神实践中的实用功能工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hiramoto S.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号