首页> 外国专利> Carbon Dioxide CO2 as renewable source of energy through bio-sequestration ex coal or gas fired electricity generators.

Carbon Dioxide CO2 as renewable source of energy through bio-sequestration ex coal or gas fired electricity generators.

机译:二氧化碳通过煤炭或天然气发电机的生物螯合作为可再生能源。

摘要

#$%^&*AU2017100115A420170323.pdf#####POLBOT New way of thinking is here. How to change C02 from a waste gas into a productive resource that provides bio-fuels or cattle fodder etc As a refractory mason and design engineer albeit a tad rusty due to retirement non the less the process of dealing with fumes from furnace operation is still easily recalled as one worked with others building literally hundreds of metre of them. There are no reason not to build a coal fired power station next to or as near as what is most practical to a coal mine, pertinent to energy distribution with least loss due to relevant distances from various outlets some where near the Adani or any coal source that is being exported. It makes no practical or in any way scientific climate or economic or even political sense not to do so. All of the above is easy to calculate, is also easy to imagine is how the expanded hot gases from the furnace are controlled and distributed. Which can be done in a lab or any appropriate location although the drawings would be enough to allow any one that understood ignition combustion and gas distribution [I do know Australia's premier expert in combustion] to be able to prove if the idea of Biosequstration of C02 into plant based resources worked. A furnace is in essence like a car engine you put fuel in there is combustion energy is produced and exhaust gases.What you do with the exhaust gases is simply a matter of thermal inclines and precipitators. Etc A furnace is something that is alive and fascinating to be around it has its own heart beat and idiosyncrasy its own smells we can by experience tell how well the furnace is or what type by how it smells the exhaust gases can be seen as pollutant or resource depending on the chemical and physical properties and technology available that utilises these. As any one familiar with industrial revolution would be aware from coal and oil a myriad of new products and endless by products were engineered mainly in Germany but also elsewhere many refinements were made in medicines dyes paints tyres plastics etc without the use of carbon based fuels there is no wiring for technology and no technology beyond the flaking of stones. I have taken the next obvious step after taking on the challenge presented in the economics of climate change and the meaning of practical and direct action taking into account botanical and biological processes. As motor car engines have been refined to use ever less fuel it stands to reason the exact same theory works in furnaces. Refine fuel as it enters the furnace create greater atmospheres within add oxygen so it is like a blast furnace and you increase combustion efficiency it is not rocket science although it may well be how rockets work. Because HELE high pressure vessels burn coal far more efficiently this already reduces the mass of C02 understanding this allows one to quantify potentials across a variable scope of possibilities. How the exhaust gases are dealt with is the answer to what to do about C02 this requires imagination for the lay person, but it is about flues and how the flues are designed and what sort of means there are to absorb as much of the C02 as possible. If we examine all relevant cost factors and Australia's ratio of C02 emission compared to global growth in same we can justify politically economically mathematically and scientifically the possibility not all C02 can be absorbed through plant growth. But at the same time because of how the earth itself is treated and type of plants used it may well be possible to absorb the majority of the C02 emitted. There must be a formula that allows calculation that explains relationship between quantity of C02 and plant growth performance reasonable estimations can be established. But the clue is providing optimum humidity and ground water. Massive constant harvest of hemp could be created for example Hemp can be used for climate proof building as its isin the EU or bio fuel or cattle fodder for times of drought and most importantly because ending plastic polluting the seas Hemp can be used for bio-degradable plastics and many other Bi-products but many plants can be used to create constant harvest so C02 becomes a source of income not a wasted resource. Basically it is called economics. If some of the energy is used to create new water but a wind or solar farm can also do the same then the optimum arrangement can be organised. It is called innovation Science Technology Engineering and Math. Jobs and growth remember were the slogan well I am offering the method. This is my IP. Kind regards Graham Gordon Thomas POLBOT Human Systems
机译:#$%^&* AU2017100115A420170323.pdf #####波尔博特新的思维方式就在这里。如何将二氧化碳从废气转化为可生产的资源提供生物燃料或牛饲料等作为一名耐火泥瓦匠和设计工程师,尽管退休后仍有些生疏不仅如此,处理炉子产生的烟雾的过程仍​​然很容易回想起一个与其他人合作建造了数百米的建筑物。没有理由不在邻近或附近建造燃煤电厂与煤矿有关的最实用的方法,与能源分配有关,因距阿达尼(Adani)或附近任何煤炭来源附近的各个出口的相关距离正在出口。它不具有任何实际或科学意义上的气候或经济意义,甚至出于政治意识也不要这样做。以上所有都是容易计算的,也容易想象是如何扩展的来自炉子的热气得到控制和分配。尽管可以绘制图纸,但可以在实验室或任何合适的位置进行足以让任何一个了解点火燃烧和气体分布的人[我愿意知道澳大利亚的首席燃烧专家]能够证明生物的想法将CO 2转化为基于植物的资源起作用。本质上,熔炉就像是汽车发动机,您将燃料放入其中,燃烧能量是产生的废气和废气。您对废气所做的只是一个问题热倾向和沉淀剂。等等炉子是活着的,充满魅力,有自己的心脏打和特质自己的气味,我们可以通过经验告诉炉子或废气的气味类型可被视为污染物或资源取决于所利用的化学和物理特性以及可用的技术这些。任何熟悉工业革命的人都会从煤炭和石油中了解到无数的新产品和无穷无尽的产品主要在德国设计,但在其他地方也进行了许多改进,包括药品,染料,轮胎,塑料等不使用碳基燃料,就没有技术布线,也没有技术超越了石头的剥落。在完成了气候变化经济学中提出的挑战以及实践和实践的意义考虑到植物和生物过程的直接行动。由于对汽车发动机进行了改进,使其使用的燃油越来越少,因此有理由对完全相同的理论适用于熔炉。在进入炉子时对燃料进行精炼,从而在添加氧气的过程中产生更大的气氛,因此就像高炉,提高燃烧效率,这不是火箭科学尽管这很可能是火箭的工作方式。因为HELE高压容器燃烧煤炭更有效的是,这已经减少了CO2的质量。在各种可能性范围内量化潜力。如何处理废气是解决二氧化碳问题的答案需要非专业人士的想象力,但这是关于烟道以及烟道如何设计和吸收尽可能多的二氧化碳的手段。如果我们检查所有相关的成本因素,并将澳大利亚的二氧化碳排放比例进行比较以同样的方式应对全球增长,我们可以在数学上从政治上,经济上和从科学上讲,并非所有的二氧化碳都可以通过植物生长吸收。但是在同时由于地球本身的处理方式和所用植物的类型,可能吸收大部分排放的二氧化碳。必须有一个允许计算的公式来解释可以建立合理的CO 2估计量和植物生长表现。但是线索是提供最佳的湿度和地下水。持续大量收获可以创建大麻,例如可以将大麻用于建筑物的防气候变化在欧盟或生物燃料或牛饲料中度过干旱,最重要的是因为终结塑料污染海洋大麻可用于生物降解塑料,许多其他双产品,但许多植物可用于创造持续的收成,因此二氧化碳成为收入来源,而不是浪费资源。基本上,它被称为经济学。如果将一些能量用于产生新水,但是风能或太阳能农场也可以这样做,则可以安排最佳安排。它被称为创新科学技术工程与数学。工作与成长记住我提供方法的口号很好。这是我的IP。亲切的问候格雷厄姆·戈登·托马斯·波尔博特人类系统

著录项

  • 公开/公告号AU2017100115A4

    专利类型

  • 公开/公告日2017-03-23

    原文格式PDF

  • 申请/专利权人 GRAHAM THOMAS;

    申请/专利号AU20170100115

  • 发明设计人 THOMAS GRAHAM GORDON;

    申请日2017-01-31

  • 分类号A01C21;B01D53/62;

  • 国家 AU

  • 入库时间 2022-08-21 13:32:10

相似文献

  • 专利
  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号