CALCULATION METHOD FOR COEFFICIENTS OF CALCULATED GEOMAGNETICALLY INDUCED CURRENT USING GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE TIME INTERVAL AND ABOVE A CERTAIN LEVEL OF MEASURED INDUCED CURRENT

• 1. 一种基于工程算法评估地磁感应电流无功扰动效应的方法 [P] . 中国专利： CN113484581A . 2021-10-08
• 2. 一种计算中低纬度地区电网中的地磁感应电流的方法 [P] . 中国专利： CN104635017B . 2017.09.26
• 3. APPARATUS TO CALCULATE COEFFICIENT OF GEOMAGNETICALLY INDUCED CURRENT AND METHOD THEREOF [P] . 韩国专利： KR101604298B1 . 2016-03-17

  机译： 计算地磁感应电流系数的装置及其方法

• 4. CALCULATION METHOD FOR INDUCED CURRENT IN SECONDS UNIT USING GEOMAGNETIC FIELD OBSERVATION DATA [P] . 韩国专利： KR101315271B1 . 2013-10-08

  机译： 利用地磁场观测数据计算第二单元感应电流的方法

• 5. SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION UNDER GEOMAGNETICALLY INDUCED CURRENT [P] . US2022037084A1 . 2022-02-03

  机译： 地磁诱导电流下差动保护的系统和方法

• 1. Global distributions of storm-time ionospheric currents as seen in geomagnetic field variations [J] . Atsuki Shlnbori, Tomoaki Hori, Yoshimasa Tanaka, 极地科学进展(英文版) . 2013,第004期
• 2. Global distributions of storm-time ionospheric currents as seen in geomagnetic field variations [J] . Atsuki Shinbori, Tomoaki Hori, Yoshimasa Tanaka, 极地科学进展：英文版 . 2013,第004期
• 3. A method to calculate design tide levels on the basis of numerical model of tidal current and its application [J] . WANG Zhen, WEI Youxing, ZHANG Changkuan 海洋学报（英文版） . 2012,第004期
• 4. Comparison Between 1-D and 3-D Geoelectric Field Methods to Calculate Geomagnetically Induced Currents: A Case Study [J] . Rui Sun, Christopher Balch Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on . 2019,第6期
• 5. Geomagnetically Induced Currents and Space Weather: Pi3 Pulsations and Extreme Values of Time Derivatives of the Geomagnetic Field's Horizontal Components [J] . Yagova N. V., Pilipenko V. A., Fedorov E. N., Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth . 2018,第5期
• 6. GLOBAL STUDY OF GEOMAGNETIC INDUCED CURRENT USING TIME DERIVATIVES OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELDS [J] . Falayi EO, Beloff N Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences . 2009,第3期
• 7. Analysis of Geomagnetically Induced Currents Validation and Application in the Assessment and Impact of Geomagnetic Disturbances [C] . Andrew Yan, Debbie Zhou, Luis Marti IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting . 2013
• 8. Study of geomagnetic disturbances and ring current variability during storm and quiet times using wavelet analysis and ground-based magnetic data from multiple stations. [D] . Xu, Zhonghua. 2011
• 9. Systemic lupus Erythematosus and geomagnetic disturbances: a time series analysis [O] . George Stojan, Flavia Giammarino, Michelle Petri 2021
• 10. Applying inversion techniques to derive source currents and geoelectric fields for geomagnetically induced current calculations [O] . J. S. de Villiers, P. J. Cilliers 2014
• 11. Re the Influence of Geomagnetic Disturbance on Geomagnetic Electrokinetograph Current-Measurements in the Barents Sea [R] . Lebedev, A. A. 1959

• 1. Impact of Geomagnetically Induced Currents Secondary Event on the High-Voltage Synchronous Motors [J] . Vera V. Vakhnina ,Aleksey A. Kuvshinov . 工程（英文）（1947-3931） . 2013,第10期
• 2. BACKGROUND： Vibrio vulnifi cus inside the body could activate the NF-!B signaling pathwayand initiate the inflammatory cascade. The lung is one of the earliest organs affected by sepsisassociated with acute lung injury. High mobility group protein B1 （HMGB1） is an important late-actingpro-infl ammatory cytokine involving in the pathophysiology of sepsis. It is also involved in the injuryprocess in the lung, liver and intestine. There has been no report on the involvement of HMGB1 inVibrio vulnifi cus sepsis-induced lung injury.METHODS： Sixty rats were randomly divided into a normal control group （group A, n=10） anda Vibrio vulnificus sepsis group （group B, n=50）. Sepsis was induced in the rats by subcutaneousinjection of Vibrio vulnificus （concentration 6×108 cfu/mL, volume 0.1 mL/100g）） into the left lowerlimbs. The rats in group B were sacrifi ced separately 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the infection.Their lungs were stored as specimens, lung water content was measured, and lung pathology wasobserved under a light microscope. The expressions of the HMGB1 gene and protein in the lungswere detected by RT-PCR and Western blot. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance（ANOVA） and the LSD method for pair-wise comparison between the two groups. P〈0.05 wasconsidered statistically signifi cant.RESULTS： Compared to group A （0.652±0.177）, HMGB1 mRNA expression in the lungs ofgroup B was signifi cantly higher at 0 hour （1.161±0.358, P=0.013）, 24 hours （1.679±0.235, P=0.000）,and 48 hours （1.258±0.274, P=0.004） （P〈0.05）, and peaked at 24 hours. Compared to group A（0.594±0.190）, HMGB1 protein expression at 6 hours （1.408±0.567, P=0.026） after infection wassignificantly increased （P〈0. 05）, and peaked at 24 hours （2.415±1.064, P=0.000） after infection.Compared to group A （0.699±0.054）, lung water content was significantly increased at 6 hours（0.759±0.030, P=0.001）,12 hours （0.767±0.023, P=0.000）, 24 hours （0.771±0.043, P=0.000） and 48hours （0.789±0.137, P=0.000） after infection （P〈0.05）. Compared to group A, pathological changesat 12 hours in group B indicate marked pulmonary vascular congestion, interstitial edema andinfl ammatory infi ltration. Alveolar cavity collapse and boundaries of the alveolar septum could not beclearly identifi ed.CONCLUSION： Vibrio vulnifi cus sepsis can lead to injury in rat lungs, and increased HMGB1expression in lung tissue may be one of the mechanisms for injury from Vibrio vulnifi cus sepsis. [J] . Qiao-meng Qiu ,Zhong-wang Li ,Lu-ming Tang . 世界急诊医学杂志(英文) . 2011,第4期
• 3. 地磁感应电流建模和计算方法的研究 [C] . 王艳艳 ,刘宗歧 ,刘连光 . 华北电力大学第五届研究生学术交流年会 . 2007
• 4. 地磁感应电流扰动的行星际源研究 [A] . 魏佳筠 . 2019