Selecting high quality text within identified reviews for display in review snippets

• 1. 一种在事件的评论列表中添加评论的方法及评论系统 [P] . 中国专利： CN107291454A . 2017-10-24
• 2. 选择用于显示的高质量评论 [P] . 中国专利： CN101313330A . 2008-11-26
• 3. Selecting high quality text within identified reviews for display in review snippets [P] . 美国专利： US2007078671A1 . 2007-04-05

  机译： 在已确定的评论中选择高质量的文本以显示在评论摘录中

• 4. Identifying clusters of similar reviews and displaying representative reviews from multiple clusters [P] . 美国专利： US7558769B2 . 2009-07-07

  机译： 识别相似评论的集群并显示多个集群中的代表性评论

• 5. Identifying clusters of similar reviews and displaying representative reviews from multiple clusters [P] . 美国专利： US2007078845A1 . 2007-04-05

  机译： 识别相似评论的集群并显示多个集群中的代表性评论

• 1. Identifying relevant concepts and factors for the sustainability of evidence-based practices within acute care contexts: a systematic review and theory analysis of selected sustainability frameworks [J] . Letitia Nadalin Penno, Barbara Davies, Ian D. Graham, Implementation Science . 2019,第1期
• 2. Agency Reviews Patent Application Approval Request for "Systems and Methods for the Comparison of Selected Text" [J] . Journal of Engineering . 2013,第13期
• 3. A systematic review of reviews to identify key research opportunities within the field of eHealth implementation [J] . Ahmed Bakhtiyar, Dannhauser Thomas, Philip Nada Journal of telemedicine and telecare . 2019,第5期
• 4. Identifying Humor in Reviews using Background Text Sources [C] . Alex Morales, ChengXiang Zhai . 2017
• 5. Hearts and Minds: An Analysis of Checks and Safeguards, Monitoring, and Performance Review of Executive Boards and Their Executive Directors within Select Nonprofit Corporations [D] . Wagner, John Michael 2018
• 6. Identifying relevant concepts and factors for the sustainability of evidence-based practices within acute care contexts: a systematic review and theory analysis of selected sustainability frameworks [O] . Letitia Nadalin Penno, Barbara Davies, Ian D. Graham, 2019
• 7. Adolescent reading and the reproduction of literary judgement: what adolescent book reviews of self-selected texts reveal [O] . Andrea Bertschi-Kaufmann, Tanja Graber 2017
• 8. Identifying, Selecting, and Refining Topics. AHRQ Series Paper 3. Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [R] . Whitlock, E. P., Lopez, S. A., Chang, S. 2009

• 1. Reporting Quality Assessment of systematic reviews on Quality of Life in Patients with Enterostomy in China [J] . Guang-Hong Han ,Xiao-Li Pang ,Yue Zhu . TMR肿瘤进展 . 2021,第6期
• 2. Methodologic quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the Mediterranean diet and cognitive function： a review [J] . Yuan Jia ,Si-Yuan Yang ,Li-Ming Guo . TMR整合护理 . 2018,第003期
• 3. Unsatisfied methodological qualities assessment of systematic reviews/Meta-analyses on Chinese medicine for stroke and their risk factors [J] . Jia-Ying Wang ,Nan Li ,Jun-Feng Wang . TMR医学数据挖掘 . 2021,第001期
• 4. Reporting quality of systematic review protocols of interventions for knee osteoarthritis:a systematic review protocol [J] . Jie-Yun Li ,Li-Yao Tang ,Hao Tang . TMR医学数据挖掘 . 2021,第003期
• 5. Report quality assessment for systematic reviews of music intervention in Alzheimer’s Disease [J] . Guang-Hong Han ,Xiao-Li Pang ,Wei-Jie Gao . 衰老研究 . 2021,第003期
• 6. 论后奥运阶段竞技体育评论文本中的修辞策略——以奥运会评论文本为例 [C] . 程红 ,吴志强 ,谢卫 . 2008年全国体育管理科学大会 . 2008
• 7. 在线旅游社区高质量评论特征及其评论用户特征研究 [A] . 陈蕾 . 2019