【24h】

COMPARISON OF EXERGY ANALYSIS BETWEEN HVAC SYSTEMS WITH MPCS AND ICE STORAGE

机译:带有MPCS和储冰系统的HVAC系统的性能分析比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ice storage system has ever been used in heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systemrnwidely. But the coefficient of performance (COP) of chiller during charging mode is much lowerrnbecause the charging temperature of ice storage is lower. Microencapsulated phase change materialrnslurry (MPCS) has more advantages than ice, when used as energy storage medium in HVAC systemrnof buildings. A general review on application of MPCS for thermal energy storage in HVACrnsystem is carried out first in this paper. Then exergy analyses for 4 kinds of HVAC systems withrnMPCs and ice for thermal energy storage have been compared. An office room is the research objectrnand calculation is based on 1kW cooling load. The results show that the low temperature airrnsupply system has the highest exergy efficiency. And for the conventional air supply systems, thernhigher efficiency is with higher secondary refrigerant temperature.
机译:冰存储系统曾经广泛地用于加热,通风和空调(HVAC)系统中。但是,由于蓄冰器的装填温度较低,因此制冷器在装填模式下的性能系数(COP)较低。当用作HVAC系统建筑物的储能介质时,微囊化相变材料浆料(MPCS)比冰具有更​​多优势。本文首先对MPCS在HVACrnsystem中的热能存储中的应用进行了综述。然后对四种带有rnMPC和冰的HVAC系统的热能分析进行了比较。研究室为办公室,其计算基于1kW的制冷负荷。结果表明,低温供气系统的火用效率最高。对于传统的空气供应系统,更高的效率是伴随着更高的二次制冷剂温度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号