首页> 外文会议>MELECON 2010;IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference >Comparison between two approaches to overload control in a Real Server: “local” or “hybrid” solutions?
【24h】

Comparison between two approaches to overload control in a Real Server: “local” or “hybrid” solutions?

机译:在Real Server中两种过载控制方法之间的比较:“本地”或“混合”解决方案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work analyzes the performances of two algorithms candidate to overload control within a server. An algorithm works according to a “local” strategy, using the concept of measuring the processor occupancy. The other algorithm takes advantage of measuring both the processor occupancy and the call losses. The latter fits in the “hybrid” family, because it exploits a further element (Load Balancer) to reduce the charge of the cpu of the server under protection. The job assumes the throughput, i.e. the number of calls managed within one second, as the unit of comparison.
机译:这项工作分析了服务器过载控制的两种算法的性能。使用测量处理器占用率的概念,算法根据“本地”策略工作。另一种算法利用了测量处理器占用率和呼叫损耗的优势。后者适合“混合”系列,因为它利用了其他元素(负载均衡器)来减少受保护服务器的CPU费用。作业将吞吐量(即在一秒钟内管理的呼叫数)作为比较单位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号