【24h】

Chairing an Academic Department: Disciplinarity and Diversity in Faculty Evaluation

机译:主持学术部门:教师评估中的学科性和多样性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In modern universities, types of faculty productivity are supposed to vary in accord with disciplines, but corporate approach to the faculty evaluation is still widely adopted in China. This paper discusses the definition of disciplines and the disciplinary classification systems of western scholars. Then the epistemological and social differences between disciplines are presented as the basis faculty evaluation, such as preference of research vs. teaching, short-term vs. long-term evaluation and team work vs. individual task. At last, universitylevel administrators as well as department chairs are encouraged to employ subject area standards instead of single or unitary mechanism of faculty evaluation.
机译:在现代大学中,教师生产力的类型应该根据学科而变化,但是在中国,企业评估教师的方法仍被广泛采用。本文讨论了西方学者的学科定义和学科分类体系。然后,将学科之间的认识论和社会差异作为基础教师评估,例如研究与教学的偏爱,短期与长期的评估以及团队与个人任务的对比。最后,鼓励大学级行政人员和系主任采用学科领域的标准,而不是采用单一或单一的教师评估机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号