首页> 外文会议>4th International Conference on University Evaluation and Research Evaluation: English Materials >Collaborative Research: A Positive Indicator of Quality Science? A Cautionary Tale
【24h】

Collaborative Research: A Positive Indicator of Quality Science? A Cautionary Tale

机译:合作研究:质量科学的积极指标?警示故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper revisits and extends the The Epistemic Authority of Collaborative Research," and adds some -comments about its implications for research evaluation. Because scientific collaboration produces research of above average quality and fertility, comparing research units by degree of collaborative activity may provide a quantitative indicator for ranking units in terms of quality. A number of caveats must be kept in mind in interpreting the data, as well as in considering potential policies about collaboration.
机译:本文回顾并扩展了“协作研究的认知权威”,并添加了一些有关其对研究评估意义的评论。由于科学协作产生的研究质量和生育力均高于平均水平,因此按协作活动程度比较研究单位可能会提供定量在质量方面对单位进行排名的指标在解释数据以及考虑潜在的合作政策时,必须牢记许多警告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号