首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society(HFES 2007); 20071001-05; Baltimore,MA(US) >Comparing Usability Problem Identification and Description by Practitioners and Students
【24h】

Comparing Usability Problem Identification and Description by Practitioners and Students

机译:从业人员和学生比较可用性问题的识别和描述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many studies of usability studies count the number of usability problems identified to measure the effectiveness of an evaluation. However, communicating problems is also important to evaluation effectiveness, because a problem found but poorly explained may not be fixed. This study compared lists of usability problems from 21 practitioners and 23 students watching a pre-recorded usability session. Lists were evaluated for the number of problems reported, and for following six guidelines for describing usability problems: be clear and avoid jargon, describe problem severity, provide backing data, describe problem causes, describe user actions, and provide a solution. There was no difference in the number of problems reported by students and practitioners, but there was a difference in their ratings for following several of the guidelines. Using both measures provides a more complete assessment of usability reports.
机译:可用性研究的许多研究都对确定的可用性问题的数量进行评估,以评估评估的有效性。但是,交流问题对于评估有效性也很重要,因为发现的问题或解释不充分的问题可能无法解决。这项研究比较了观看预录的可用性会议的21名从业者和23名学生的可用性问题列表。对列表进行了评估,以报告所报告的问题数量,并按照以下六项准则来描述可用性问题:明确并避免使用行话,描述问题严重性,提供支持数据,描述问题原因,描述用户操作并提供解决方案。学生和从业人员报告的问题数量没有差异,但遵循以下几条准则的评分不同。使用这两种方法可以对可用性报告进行更完整的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号