THE IMPORTANCE OF 'SIGNIFICANT' SCC DATA REPORTED TO THE NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD -AN UPDATE

机译：报告给国家能源委员会的“重要” SCC数据的重要性-更新

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The National Energy Board (NEB) held an Inquiry in 1995 to determine the extent of knowledge and occurrence of SCC on Canadian oil and gas pipelines. The Report of the Inquiry, which was published in December 1996, issued 27 recommendations to promote public safety by encouraging the sharing of information on the extent of SCC and methods for managing and mitigating it.rnA major recommendation of the Report stated "that the NEB requires companies to report immediately to the NEB any finding of "significant" SCC and any immediate mitigative actions taken..." The definition of "significant" SCC is based on the definition adopted by the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA) at the time of the Inquiry. Subsequently the NEB has required companies to submit this information and has used it to monitor the extent of and management of "significant" SCC on their regulated pipelines. This paper examines trends identified from the over 500 "significant" SCC reports submitted to the NEB. The analysis examines trends associated with product shipped, coating type, pipe grade, year of manufacture and SCC location on the pipe. In addition the paper will highlight the length and depth of "significant" SCC features, their methods of detection and the mitigation steps used to reduce any threat posed by the SCC. From the information presented in the paper, companies and regulators should be able to compare their "significant" SCC findings with the NEB average and in so doing aid in the continued management of SCC.

机译：美国国家能源委员会（NEB）于1995年进行了一次调查，以确定对加拿大石油和天然气管道的了解以及SCC的发生。调查报告于1996年12月发布，发布了27条建议，通过鼓励共享有关SCC的程度以及管理和缓解SCC的方法的信息来促进公共安全。rn该报告的主要建议指出：“ NEB要求公司立即向NEB报告任何“重大” SCC发现的结果以及所采取的任何立即采取的缓解措施...”“重大” SCC的定义基于当时加拿大能源管道协会（CEPA）所采用的定义查询。随后，NEB要求公司提交此信息，并使用它来监视其受监管管道中“重要” SCC的范围和管理。本文研究了从提交给NEB的500多个“重要” SCC报告中发现的趋势。该分析检查与产品运输，涂层类型，管道等级，制造年份和管道上SCC位置相关的趋势。此外，本文还将重点介绍“重要” SCC功能的长度和深度，其检测方法以及用于减少SCC构成的威胁的缓解步骤。根据本文提供的信息，公司和监管机构应该能够将其“重大”的SCC调查结果与NEB平均值进行比较，从而有助于SCC的持续管理。

著录项

来源
《ASME international pipeline conference 2008》|2008年|867-874|共8页
会议地点 Calgary(CA);Calgary(CA);Calgary(CA)
作者
Joe Paviglianiti; Alan Murray; Jason Harrison;
展开▼
作者单位

National Energy Board Calgary, Alberta, Canada;

National Energy Board Calgary, Alberta, Canada;

National Energy Board Calgary, Alberta, Canada;

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: updated recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting [J] . Kench James G., Judge Meagan, Delahunt Brett, Virchows Archiv: an international journal of pathology . 2019,第3期

机译：在激进的前列腺切除术中报告前列腺癌的数据集：从国际癌症报告的国际合作的更新建议
2. TransCanada Corp. Reports First Quarter Financials With National Energy Board Decision Impact Factored In [J] . Foster Natural Gas Report Group Foster Natural Gas Report . 2013,第2948期

机译：TransCanada Corp.报告第一季度财务数据，其中考虑了美国国家能源委员会的决策影响
3. Canadian National Energy Board Reports Pipeline Ruptures in 2007, First Since 2002 [J] . Peter Menyasz International environment reporter . 2009,第18期

机译：加拿大国家能源局报告2007年管道破裂，自2002年以来首次
4. THE IMPORTANCE OF 'SIGNIFICANT' SCC DATA REPORTED TO THE NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD -AN UPDATE [C] . ASME international pipeline conference . 2009

机译：“重要”SCC数据向国家能源委员会报告的重要性-AN更新
5. Automatic updating of structural models using inspection report data. [D] . Foy, Timothy. 2014

机译：使用检验报告数据自动更新结构模型。
6. Retrospectively Estimating Energy Intake and Misreporting From a Qualitative Food Frequency Questionnaire: An Example Using Australian Cohort and National Survey Data [O] . James P. Goode, Kylie J. Smith, Michelle Kilpatrick, 2021

机译：从定性食品频率调查问卷中回顾性估计能量摄入和误报：使用澳大利亚队列和国家调查数据的示例
7. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines) 11This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in September 2002, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2002, and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology in August 2002.22The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur. The conflict of interest information for the writing committee members is posted on the ACC, AHA, and NASPE Web sites with the full-length version of the update.33When citing this document, the ACC, the AHA, and NASPE would appreciate the following citation format: Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Winters SL. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol2002;40:1703–19.44Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699 (ask for No. 71-0237). To obtain a copy of the Summary Article, ask for reprint No. 71-0236. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.55(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703–19.)66©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gregoratos Gabriel, Abrams Jonathan, Epstein Andrew E, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会将更新1998年起搏器指南） 11该文件于2002年9月获得美国心脏病学会基金会董事会的批准，于2002年8月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准，并于2002年8月获得北美起搏和电生理学会的批准。22ACC / AHA工作组《实践指南》将尽一切努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审核，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。撰写委员会成员的利益冲突信息已发布在更新的完整版本的ACC，AHA和NASPE网站上。33当引用本文档时，ACC，AHA和NASPE将不胜感激。格式：Gregoratos G，Abrams J，Epstein AE，Freedman RA，Hayes DL，Hlatky MA，Kerber RE，Naccarelli GV，Schoenfeld MH，Silka MJ，Winters SL。 ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会更新了1998年起搏器指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol2002； 40：1703–19.44复制：此文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。您可以致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，获得一份完整的指南（请致电71-0237））。要获得摘要文章的副本，请索要第71-0236号转载。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或发送电子邮件至kbradle@lww.com.55（J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1703–19。）66©2002美国心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司

THE IMPORTANCE OF 'SIGNIFICANT' SCC DATA REPORTED TO THE NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD -AN UPDATE

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅