• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Climate Change Conference 2013: Impacts, Policy and Regulation >RGGI Unplugged: Accounting for All CO_2 Emissions from the Electric Power Consumed in the RGGI Region
【24h】

RGGI Unplugged: Accounting for All CO_2 Emissions from the Electric Power Consumed in the RGGI Region

机译：RGGI已拔出：计入RGGI地区所消耗的电力所产生的所有CO_2排放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The addition of a CO_2 monitoring and compliance requirement for imports can be expected to raise additional compliance issues for electric service providers. Companies will need to determine the best way to meet their compliance obligations based on the carbon intensity of their energy portfolios. Presuming that a carbon compliance obligation would necessitate the acquisition of RGGI allowances to reflect the carbon content of energy purchases, electric service providers should have a number of options to comply with this requirement, including: 1. Reducing the carbon content of their supply portfolios by identifying and requesting recognition for specified energy purchases; 2. Contracting with developers of lower-emitting generation; 3. Taking advantage of RGGI flexibility provisions, e.g., three-year control period and banking; and 4. Making greater investments in energy efficiency and other demand-side resources. There are a number of legal, regulatory, and administrative implications associated with developing a tracking system that can potentially support expanding the existing RGGI program to include emissions associated with the purchase of energy from outside the RGGI region. States will need to work with administrators at GATS, GIS, and the relevant tracking system authority in New York to determine the changes necessary to the tracking systems in order for states to be able to regularly determine the amount of MWh each LSE uses to serve load in its service territory, and the sources of that energy. Acquiring and populating the tracking systems with robust emissions data would be a central part of any such effort. Having sufficient access to the system for quality assurance and control purposes will also be necessary. States need to confer with tracking system administrators to achieve a level of access to processes and calculations that ensures state confidence in the soundness of the tracking systems. Each state will need to determine the extent of its authority to take necessary steps to expand its program. RGGI states should also consider whether or not their existing authority to implement electric supply portfolio standards for renewable or other resources might provide the authority to track emissions associated with such a compliance obligation. At a minimum, states would need to develop rules regarding: 1. The tracking of various transaction types; and 2. The methodology for calculating adjusted residual mix and other tracking system features, including: a. Articulating the fields required to be added to the tracking system, and b. Publishing the necessary reports to make this newly developed emissions information available. Regulators and tracking system administrators should develop a standard set of protocols for regulator access to tracking systems, and for addressing quality assurance and quality control concerns that regulators will have in using these systems to track energy use. RGGI states should also consider what other specific, standardized procedures they will need to develop if they choose to use these systems for tracking purposes. In addition, RGGI states will need to determine the degree to which individual state rules (statutes, regulations, orders, etc.) will need to be addressed, and assess the potential effects that the recognition of these emissions will have on existing state emissions budgets.
机译：预计增加对进口的CO_2监测和合规性要求会给电力服务提供商带来其他合规性问题。公司将需要根据其能源组合的碳强度来确定履行其合规义务的最佳方法。假设碳合规义务需要获得RGGI配额以反映能源购买的碳含量，则电力服务提供商应具有多种选择来满足此要求，包括：1.通过以下方式降低其供应组合的碳含量：确定并请求认可特定的能源购买； 2.与低排放的开发商签约； 3.利用RGGI的灵活性条款，例如三年控制期和银行业务； 4.加大对能源效率和其他需求方资源的投资。跟踪系统的开发涉及许多法律，法规和行政方面的问题，可以潜在地支持扩展现有的RGGI计划，以包括与从RGGI区域以外购买能源有关的排放。州将需要与GATS，GIS和纽约州相关跟踪系统主管机构的管理员合作，确定对跟踪系统的必要更改，以便各州能够定期确定每个LSE用于服务负荷的MWh数量在其服务范围内以及该能源的来源。用强大的排放数据获取并填充跟踪系统将是任何此类工作的核心部分。为了质量保证和控制目的，必须有足够的访问系统的权限。州需要与跟踪系统管理员协商，以达到对流程和计算的访问级别，以确保状态对跟踪系统的健全性充满信心。每个州都需要确定其权限范围，以采取必要步骤来扩展其计划。 RGGI州还应考虑其现有权限来实施可再生能源或其他资源的电力供应组合标准，是否可以提供权限来跟踪与此类合规义务相关的排放。各州至少需要制定有关以下方面的规则：1.跟踪各种交易类型； 2.计算调整后的剩余混合量和其他跟踪系统特征的方法，包括：阐明需要添加到跟踪系统中的字段，以及b。发布必要的报告以使此新近开发的排放信息可用。监管者和跟踪系统管理员应制定一套标准协议，以便监管者访问跟踪系统，并解决监管者在使用这些系统跟踪能源使用方面的质量保证和质量控制问题。 RGGI州还应该考虑，如果他们选择使用这些系统进行跟踪，则还需要开发其他哪些特定的标准化程序。此外，RGGI州将需要确定需要处理各个州规则（法规，法规，命令等）的程度，并评估对这些排放量的认识对现有州排放预算的潜在影响。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号