• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>The cost and effectiveness of policies to reduce vehicle emissions >SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS
【24h】

SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS

机译：讨论摘要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is considerable consensus, but no unanimity, that pursuing climate change goals will require greenhouse gas abatement efforts in the transport sector, and that a combination of incentive-based instruments and regulation of fuel economy is appropriate. Agreement on just how much effort should be asked from transport, and consequently on the stringency of transport policy packages, is less wide. The case for substantial effort from transport relies to a considerable extent on assertions that technology costs for improving fuel economy are quite low and that market inefficiencies exist, particularly regarding consumer and producer decisions on fuel economy. These same arguments favour a policy package where regulation and incentive mechanisms complement each other. The case against particularly strong efforts in transport relies on assertions that cheaper abatement options exist in other sectors, as well as on the policy position that current measures already cover marginal external costs, making further efforts undesirable.
机译：达成共识，但没有一致意见，即要实现气候变化目标将需要交通运输部门减少温室气体的努力，并且将基于激励的手段与燃油经济性监管结合起来是适当的。关于应从运输中要求多少努力以及因此在运输政策一揽子计划的严格性方面的共识，范围不广。运输业付出巨大努力的理由在很大程度上取决于这样的说法，即改善燃油经济性的技术成本相当低，并且市场效率低下，特别是在消费者和生产者就燃油经济性做出决定时。这些相同的论点也有利于一揽子政策，其中监管和激励机制相互补充。反对在运输方面作出特别强有力的努力的理由是，有这样的论点，即其他部门存在更便宜的减排选择，以及政策立场，即当前的措施已经涵盖了边际外部成本，使得进一步的努力是不可取的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号