• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>The Fourth International Conference on Systems Science and Systems Engineering (ICSSSE'03); Nov 25-28, 2003; Hong Kong SAR, China >A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS METHODOLOGIES IN MANAGEMENT
【24h】

A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS METHODOLOGIES IN MANAGEMENT

机译：管理中理解系统方法的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Frameworks and methodologies are commonly used in management practice. Well-known examples include SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats), McCarthy's "4 Ps" in Marketing (Product, Price, Promotion and Place), Deming's Continuous Improvement Model (Plan, Do, Check, Act) and Covey's Four Human Needs (To Live, To Learn, To Love, and to Leave a Legacy). This paper proposes that such systems can be understood by reference to common decision structures. It shows that these structures emerge from processes that underlie decisions regularly undertaken by managers. Where such decisions are made over a long period they lead to the development of a language that encapsulates a set of constructs that embodies the relevant underlying structure. Because management decisions have much in common it follows that similar settled practices in many different contexts and situations can be related to others by reference to their common underlying structures. The paper builds on previous research that showed the correspondence between Western and Chinese systems such as WSR (Zhu and Gu) and the I Ching. It proposed that this meta-system approach could be used for inter-cultural studies in management and for building bridges between different branches of business. The paper suggests that any management system can be deconstructed, explained and reconstructed with the help of the generic structure and the underlying dimensions. Examples of comparable systems are given. (The four systems referred to above appear to be but are not comparable.) It suggests that generic systems can be used to evaluate and improve systems used in management practice by identifying missing parts, correcting language and specifying underlying dimensions.
机译：框架和方法通常用于管理实践中。著名的例子包括SWOT分析（优势，劣势，机会和威胁），麦卡锡的营销“ 4 Ps”（产品，价格，促销和位置），戴明的持续改进模型（计划，执行，检查，执行）和Covey的四个人的需求（生活，学习，爱和留下遗产）。本文提出可以通过参考通用决策结构来理解此类系统。它表明，这些结构来自于管理人员定期进行的决策的流程。在长期做出此类决定的地方，它们导致了语言的发展，该语言封装了体现相关底层结构的一组构造。由于管理决策具有很多共性，因此可以通过参考其他共同的基础结构，在许多不同的情况和情况下将相似的解决方案与其他事物相关联。该论文以先前的研究为基础，该研究显示了WSR（朱和顾）与《易经》等中西系统之间的对应关系。它建议，该元系统方法可用于管理中的跨文化研究，以及在不同业务部门之间建立桥梁。本文建议，借助通用结构和底层维度，可以对任何管理系统进行解构，解释和重构。给出了可比系统的示例。 （上面提到的四个系统似乎是可比较的，但是不可比较。）它建议通过识别缺少的部分，更正语言并指定基本尺寸，可以将通用系统用于评估和改进管理实践中使用的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号