首页> 外文会议>Information*knowledge*evolution >THE EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS: COMPLEMENTARY AND COMPETING PERSPECTIVES
【24h】

THE EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS: COMPLEMENTARY AND COMPETING PERSPECTIVES

机译:自动化系统的评估:补充和竞争观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The evaluation of automated library systems is an essential component of system planning and implementation. The type of information needed -technical, organizational or patron service - will determine the tools and methods of evaluation. Complementary but sometimes competing perspectives have an impact on the objectives and nature of system assessment. The system designer, the system vendor, the automation project director, the library administrator, and the staff and patron users of the system all have a significant stake in the application of evaluation results. It is the perspective of the system user that must, however, achieve hegemony over all others and drive the evaluation process. Evaluation presents the opportunity to learn a great deal about user needs, preferences and behavior, and about the responsiveness of automated systems.
机译:自动化图书馆系统的评估是系统规划和实施的重要组成部分。所需的信息类型-技术,组织或赞助服务-将确定评估的工具和方法。互补但有时相互竞争的观点会影响系统评估的目标和性质。系统设计师,系统供应商,自动化项目负责人,图书馆管理员以及系统的员工和主顾用户在评估结果的应用中均具有重大利益。但是,系统用户的观点必须实现对所有其他人的霸权并推动评估过程。评估提供了一个学习大量有关用户需求,偏好和行为以及自动化系统响应能力的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号