首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Systems Engineering >Improved System Engineering Technical Review’s Entrance/Exit Criteria with Model Maturity Metrics
【24h】

Improved System Engineering Technical Review’s Entrance/Exit Criteria with Model Maturity Metrics

机译:使用模型成熟度指标改进的系统工程技术评论的进入/退出条件

获取原文

摘要

Existing Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETR) are currently reliant on static, document-based Entrance/Exit Criteria (EEC) and Objective Qualifying Evidence (OQE) which is often disjointed and difficult to follow. With the implementation of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) a more qualitative set of EECs, based on expected levels of Descriptive System Model (DSM) maturity, can be used to evaluate readiness for SETR completion. A paradigm shift of this magnitude requires stakeholder buy-in and input to determine evaluation factors for DSM maturity. The ability to dynamically assess model maturity requires well defined. relation-mapping and methodology. Given the above conditions are met, a metric suite can be established, within a profile, to assess a model's maturity and quality. The metric suite can be applied to any model using the same mapping and methodology. The metric suite probes the model and returns a maturity percentage that can be compared to predetermined, tailorable values. This assessment can then be used to determine readiness for a given SETR milestone.This paper captures a proof of concept experiment for implementing metrics as a portion of Entrance Criteria for a Critical Design Review. A subset of metrics was developed to build stakeholder buy-in, indicating the development of a system has matured sufficiently to be reviewed for a SETR milestone decision. The initial demonstration was well received and there are continuing efforts to improve the ability to assess a model's maturity for SETR milestones. The experiment identified that the metrics are unable to assess against gap information. In contrast, the benefits gained from using a dynamic set of entrance criteria include enabling a more event-based SETR, improved confidence in the model's validity, and can be used to provide more data to assist with effort resource planning.
机译:现有的系统工程技术评论(SETR)当前依赖于静态的,基于文档的进入/退出标准(EEC)和客观资格证明(OQE),这些证明常常是脱节且难以遵循的。随着基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)的实施,基于描述性系统模型(DSM)成熟度的预期水平,一套更定性的EEC可用于评估SETR完成的准备情况。这种规模的范式转变需要利益相关者的认同和投入,以确定DSM成熟度的评估因素。动态评估模型成熟度的能力需要明确定义。关系映射和方法。如果满足上述条件,则可以在配置文件中建立度量套件,以评估模型的成熟度和质量。度量标准套件可以使用相同的映射和方法应用于任何模型。度量标准套件会探查模型并返回可与预定的可定制值进行比较的成熟度百分比。然后,可以使用此评估来确定给定SETR里程碑的准备情况。本文捕获了用于实施度量的概念验证实验,该度量是作为关键设计审查的“进入标准”的一部分。已开发了一组度量标准来建立利益相关者的认可,表明系统的开发已经足够成熟,可以进行审查以进行SETR里程碑决定。最初的演示很受好评,并且正在继续努力提高评估模型对SETR里程碑成熟度的能力。实验确定,指标无法根据差距信息进行评估。相比之下,使用一组动态的入学条件所获得的好处包括启用更多基于事件的SETR,提高对模型有效性的置信度,并可用于提供更多数据以帮助进行工作量资源计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号