【24h】

The Cost of the Managed and Unmanaged Incremental Integration Software Testing

机译:托管和非托管增量集成软件测试的成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper studies incremental integration testing from the management point of view for software developed through procedural paradigm. It considers the managed, planned and tracked, incremental integration testing. The advantage of the managed way of testing is the fact that testing becomes visible when the managed way is performed. This visibility enables us to see the process of testing in detail and thus contributes to better testing. The aim is to determine the cost of the managed incremental integration testing measured as the actual effort spent on this testing and compare it with the cost of the unmanaged testing. The cost determination has three steps. First, the managed incremental integration testing is completely and precisely defined. Second, this managed incremental integration testing is applied to the development of a number of programs and the data on testing are collected. Third, based upon these data the cost of the managed and unmanaged incremental integration testing are computed and compared. The analysis shows that the cost of the managed incremental integration testing is greater than the cost of the unmanaged testing of approximately 23%. Without this quantitative analysis, the comparison between the managed and unmanaged way of testing can be just qualitative and thus vague.
机译:本文从管理的角度研究了通过程序范式开发的软件的增量集成测试。它考虑了托管,计划和跟踪的增量集成测试。托管测试方式的优点在于,在执行托管方式时测试变得可见。这种可见性使我们能够详细查看测试过程,从而有助于更好的测试。目的是确定托管增量集成测试的成本,该成本以实际花费在该测试上的成本来衡量,并将其与非托管测试的成本进行比较。成本确定包含三个步骤。首先,完整,精确地定义了托管增量集成测试。其次,将这种托管的增量集成测试应用于许多程序的开发,并收集有关测试的数据。第三,基于这些数据,可以计算和比较托管和非托管增量集成测试的成本。分析表明,托管增量集成测试的成本要比非托管测试的成本高大约23%。如果没有这种定量分析,则在托管和非托管测试方式之间的比较可能只是定性的,因此比较模糊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号