【24h】

Damage Compensation and Risk-Informed Regulation: Status and Trends in the EU

机译:损害赔偿和风险告知法规:欧盟的现状和趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are clear differences in the perception of the desirability of an activity. The conversion of these perceptions in decisions is called politics. Consequences weigh more than probabilities, the involuntary more than the voluntary, the unfamiliar more than the familiar and the distrusted more than the trusted. Therefore: Risk criteria are an expression of peoples preferences then and there, risk management is highly contextual and risk policies are rarely transferable. As risk assessments methods, risk acceptability and risks differ, standards for too much too soon are likely to be counterproductive. However, harmonisation at an appropriate level is much needed. Else, lacking quantifiable social acceptance criteria, it could become generally accepted "precautionary wisdom" to follow that just because a risk could have been avoided it also has to be avoided. In summary, there is still significant European added value in further research in the area, e.g. on a more non-linear risk characterisation, presentation of results, qualification of risk assessments and uncertainty mapping, costs of accidents, and public participation.
机译:在对一项活动的期望程度的认识上存在明显差异。这些观念在决策中的转换称为政治。后果比概率更重要,非自愿比自愿更重要,不熟悉比熟悉的要重,对不信任的信任更受信任。因此:风险标准是人们偏好的一种表达,那里,风险管理是高度关联的,风险政策很少可以转移。由于风险评估的方法,风险的可接受性和风险各不相同,因此过高的标准可能会适得其反。但是,非常需要在适当水平上进行协调。否则,由于缺乏可量化的社会接受标准,因此可以仅仅因为可以避免风险而也必须避免这种风险,这已成为公认的“预防智慧”。总之,在该领域的进一步研究中,欧洲仍然具有重大的附加价值,例如更非线性的风险表征,结果表示,风险评估的资格和不确定性图,事故成本以及公众参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号