首页> 外文会议>International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference(ISEC-03); 20050920-23; Shunan(JP) >Impact of time lag analysis on TQM implementation within construction related SMEs
【24h】

Impact of time lag analysis on TQM implementation within construction related SMEs

机译:时滞分析对建筑相关中小型企业实施全面质量管理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Studies on time-lag analysis present mixed findings, the main two schools of thought are those for the fact there would be a difference between early adopters and late adopters (i.e. Powell 1995; Taylor and Wright 2003; and Reed et al 1996). On the other side of the coin are those claiming that there is no difference between early adopters and late adopters. In addition, most of the studies conducted are in large organisations and the impact of time-lag on benefits of TQM implementation remains unexplored. Thus the motivation for this section is to address the identified omissions. The main aims of this paper are twofold; firstly to ascertain whether the perceived TQM success was associated with the length of time since adoption of TQM, secondly to determine whether the strengths of model relationships are affected by TQM duration. Time-lag analysis is then addressed through the contingency analysis which involves an examination of the invariance of levels of the TQM deployment constructs across sub groups based on TQM maturity. The classification of organisations based on Ahire and Dreyfus (2000) is as follows; Recent TQM implementers (3 or few years of TQM) and Experienced TQM implementers (more than 3 years of TQM). The findings indicate that there is little difference in the deployment of TQM based on duration of the program. Secondly time lag between the variation in a casual and the consequent variation of the caused construct is not great. Time lag is considered in this TQ-SMART model as evidenced by the inclusion of indirect path which emanates from the executive commitment and reaches the organisation performance variables through various intermediate variables.
机译:时滞分析的研究结果不一,主要的两种观点是早期采用者和晚期采用者之间会有差异的事实(即Powell 1995; Taylor and Wright 2003;以及Reed等1996)。另一方面,那些声称早期采用者与晚期采用者之间没有区别的人。此外,进行的大多数研究都是在大型组织中进行的,时滞对TQM实施收益的影响尚待探索。因此,本节的目的是要解决已确定的遗漏。本文的主要目的是双重的。首先,确定感知到的TQM成功是否与采用TQM以来的时间长短有关;其次,确定模型关系的强度是否受TQM持续时间影响。然后通过偶然性分析解决时滞分析,该分析涉及根据TQM成熟度跨子组检查TQM部署构造的级别不变性。根据Ahire和Dreyfus(2000)进行的组织分类如下:最近的TQM实施者(TQM三年或几年)和经验丰富的TQM实施者(TQM三年以上)。调查结果表明,根据计划的持续时间,TQM的部署几乎没有差异。其次,在偶然的变化和所引起的结构的随后变化之间的时间间隔不是很大。在TQ-SMART模型中考虑了时间滞后,这可以通过包含间接路径来证明,该间接路径源自执行承诺,并通过各种中间变量到达组织绩效变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号