首页> 外文会议> >A cost comparison of the ellipsoidal acoustic infinite element method and the spherical acoustic infinite element method
【24h】

A cost comparison of the ellipsoidal acoustic infinite element method and the spherical acoustic infinite element method

机译:椭球声无限元法与球声无限元法的成本比较

获取原文

摘要

A cost comparison of the ellipsoidal acoustic infinite element method (EAIEM)and the spherical acoustic infinite element method (SAIEM) is discussed by converting the calculational cost of infinite elements into that of finite elements. Compares to the EAIEM, the advantage of the SAIEM is evident when the dimensionless frequency is less than 10 or the ratio of the length to the width of the acoustic source is less than 10, even if using the EAIEM reduces the number of finite elements between the acoustic source and the artificial boundary. The advantage of the EAIEM is more and more remarkable as the dimensionless frequency and the ratio of the length to the width of the acoustic source increase. The efficiency and the precision of the EAIEM should be researched further to reach the highest potential of the EAIEM.
机译:通过将无限元的计算成本转换为有限元的计算成本,讨论了椭球声学无限元方法(EAIEM)和球形声学无限元方法(SAIEM)的成本比较。与EAIEM相比,当无量纲频率小于10或声源的长度与宽度之比小于10时,即使使用EAIEM减少了之间的有限元数量,SAIEM的优势也显而易见。声源和人工边界。随着无量纲频率和声源长度与宽度之比的增加,EAIEM的优势越来越明显。 EAIEM的效率和精度应进一步研究,以实现EAIEM的最大潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号