首页> 外文会议>Computers and Advanced Technology in Education >A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS LAW COURSES
【24h】

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS LAW COURSES

机译:在线与传统本科商业法课程的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

The trend in academia to online learning has gained momentum in the past decade, due in part to the cost of higher education, a changing student profile, lack of traditional classroom space, and the recognition that distance learning has created a new paradigm of instruction. Universities wishing to maintain or expand enrollments need to be able to respond effectively to the educational needs of working adults, students in the military and residents of rural communities as well as of other countries. Online (internet-based) course offerings constitute a creative and increasingly popular response to these challenges. As more and more institutions of higher learning offer online courses, the question arises whether they are, or can be, as effective as courses offered in the traditional classroom format. Answering the question has been the focus of several studies. Our study compared students enrolled in both online and traditional classroom versions of one business law course, BLAW 1050, where all elements were the same except for the instruction format. The study found no significant difference between the two formats with regard to student satisfaction and student learning. The findings support earlier comparisons of online and traditional instruction modes.
机译:在过去的十年中,学术界向在线学习的趋势得到了发展,其中部分原因是高等教育成本,学生状况的变化,传统教室空间的匮乏以及对远程学习创造了新的教学范式的认识。希望维持或扩大入学人数的大学必须能够有效地应对在职成年人,军人学生以及农村社区以及其他国家的居民的教育需求。在线(基于Internet的)课程产品构成了对这些挑战的创造性且越来越受欢迎的响应。随着越来越多的高等院校提供在线课程,人们就产生了与传统教室形式的课程一样有效的问题。回答这个问题一直是几项研究的重点。我们的研究比较了参加一门商法课程BLAW 1050的在线和传统课堂版本的学生,其中除指导格式外,所有要素都是相同的。该研究发现两种形式在学生满意度和学生学习方面没有显着差异。这些发现支持了在线和传统教学模式的早期比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号