• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>HCI international 2009;International conference on human-computer interaction >Evaluating Usability-Supporting Architecture Patterns: Reactions from Usability Professionals
【24h】

Evaluating Usability-Supporting Architecture Patterns: Reactions from Usability Professionals

机译：评估可用性支持的体系结构模式：可用性专业人员的反应

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Usability professionals and software engineers approach software design differently, which creates a communication gap that hinders effective usability design discussions. An online survey was conducted to evaluate how usability professionals react to Usability-Supporting Architecture Patterns (USAPs) as a potential way to bridge this gap. Members of the Usability Professionals Association (UPA) participated in a pretest-posttest control group design experiment where they answered questions about USAPs and software design. Results suggest that participants perceived USAPs as useful to account for usability in software architectures, recognizing the importance of the USAPs stated usability benefits. Additionally, results showed a difference in perception of the USAPs stated usability benefits between US and European participants. A better understanding of what the usability community thinks about USAPs can lead to their improvement as well as increased adoption by software engineers, which can lead to better integration of usability and HCI principles into software design.
机译：可用性专业人员和软件工程师以不同的方式对待软件设计，这造成了沟通空白，从而阻碍了有效的可用性设计讨论。进行了一项在线调查，以评估可用性专业人员对可用性支持体系结构模式（USAP）的反应，以此作为弥合这种差距的一种潜在方法。可用性专业人员协会（UPA）的成员参加了测试前-测试后控制组设计实验，他们回答了有关USAP和软件设计的问题。结果表明，参与者认识到USAP对说明软件体系结构的可用性很有用，并认识到USAP指出了可用性优势的重要性。此外，结果表明，美国和欧洲参与者对USAP声明的可用性优势的看法有所不同。更好地了解可用性社区对USAP的看法可以导致对它们的改进以及软件工程师的采用，从而可以将可用性和HCI原理更好地集成到软件设计中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号