• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Annual Pacific Telecommunications Council conference and exhibition >The Role of Information Communication Technology Policies in Economic Development: A Comparison of Select Asian Countries and the U.S.
【24h】

The Role of Information Communication Technology Policies in Economic Development: A Comparison of Select Asian Countries and the U.S.

机译：信息通信技术政策在经济发展中的作用：选择亚洲国家和美国的比较

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although many countries around the world have modern telecommunications networks that support broadband access to the home, broadband penetration rates vary across these countries. One of the key factors explaining this difference in penetration rates are the government initiatives in the various countries, particularly in the more developed Asian economies, to achieve specific national information communication objectives. Specifically, the governments of South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore, have launched “Version 4.0” of the National Information Infrastructure (NII) plan first deployed in the early 1990s. Governments are motivated to develop national broadband networks for several reasons, including increasing productivity in the national economy, job creation as well as increasing the effectiveness of the health care system and education through tele-health and tele-education initiatives, respectively. But it is not clear if national government policies are more effective than “lassaire fare” approaches in achieving these goals. This paper assesses the effectiveness of these government NII policies, in South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, compared to the United States, in achieving economic and social development. Specifically, some of the questions that this paper addresses include the following: ??What is the current status of deployment rates of these new ICT applications and services? ?Is there any empirical evidence to suggest that the governments have been able to achieve their espoused economic goals through their national policies? Have government policies being effective in encouraging development of new innovative services or has a “lassaire fare” approach been more successful? ?Have some national governments been more successful in achieving their stated goals? What are the factors explaining the differences in achievements?
机译：虽然全球许多国家都有现代电信网络，但支持宽带访问家庭，宽带普及率因这些国家而异。解释这种渗透率差异的关键因素之一是各国政府举措，特别是在更发达的亚洲经济体中，以实现特定的国家信息通信目标。具体来说，韩国，台湾，日本，马来西亚和新加坡政府推出了在20世纪90年代初期部署的国家信息基础设施（NII）计划的“版本4.0”。各国政府有动力制定国家宽带网络，包括几种原因，包括日益增加的国民经济生产力，工作创作，以及通过远程卫生和远程教育倡议的卫生系统和教育的有效性。但如果国家政府政策更有效，而不是在实现这些目标方面的“兰德票价”方法中，这是不明确的。本文评估了这些政府NII政策的有效性，与美国实现经济和社会发展相比，韩国，台湾和新加坡的有效性。具体而言，本文地址的一些问题包括以下内容：??这些新ICT应用程序和服务的部署率的当前状态如何？ ？是否有任何经验证据表明各国政府能够通过国家政策实现支持的经济目标？政府政策是否有效地鼓励开发新的创新服务或有“兰德尔票价”的方法更成功？吗？有一些国家政府在实现其指定的目标方面更成功吗？解释成就差异有哪些因素？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号