• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >ANALYSIS OF THE JURISDICTION OVER FACILITIES BUILT ON THE MOON
【24h】

ANALYSIS OF THE JURISDICTION OVER FACILITIES BUILT ON THE MOON

机译：月球上设施管辖权的分析

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

With the exploration and use of the Moon being the province of all mankind, it is essential to get legally prepared for potential disputes related to the jurisdiction of the facilities built on the Moon. Assume that in the near future, there will be facilities such as planetary structures being built on the Moon. States will launch preliminary materials for the purpose of building manned or unmanned complex, and they will probably start to process resources from the Moon to continue with further building. Due to the change of economic policies, the consideration of scientific research or any other reasons, a State may very well abandon facilities and structures on the Moon, which can immediately be occupied by other states. Under the circumstance that Outer space activities are high-risk, these facilities and structures may lead to the damage to personnel and property of the occupying state or even a third party. In the wake of potential detriments in such outer space activities, questions concerning liability are raised, which ultimately lead to the clarification of jurisdiction. This paper presents and analyzes the existing rules and regulations regarding jurisdiction of space objects in current international law, in particular with the character of the facilities on the Moon as a compound of materials made of resources from both the Earth and the Moon. This paper then points out a vague zone between the Registration Convention and the Moon Agreement. The latter specifies the Moon and its resources as the common heritage of mankind, which in the case of facilities containing resources from the Moon, contradicts with the former because a State of registry has jurisdiction over a space object, leaving doubts regarding jurisdiction over the registered part from the Moon. Possible explanations in the light of the Outer Space Treaty are presented with further appropriate solutions. The issue then developed by discussing relevant responsibility based on the abandonment of the integrated facilities. The analysis of jurisdiction over facilities built on the Moon provides possible solutions for determining potential liability.
机译：由于对月球的探索和使用是全人类的省份，因此必须为与在月球上建造的设施的管辖权有关的潜在纠纷做好法律准备。假设在不久的将来，将在月球上建造诸如行星结构之类的设施。各国将为建造有人或无人综合设施而发布初步材料，它们可能会开始处理来自月球的资源以继续进行进一步的建造。由于经济政策的变化，科学研究的考虑或任何其他原因，一个国家很可能会放弃月球上的设施和构架，而这些设施和构架可能会立即被其他国家占领。在外层空间活动具有高风险的情况下，这些设施和结构可能会导致对占领国乃至第三方的人员和财产造成损害。在此类外层空间活动可能造成损害之后，引起了有关赔偿责任的问题，最终导致对管辖权的澄清。本文介绍并分析了现行国际法中有关空间物体管辖权的现行规则和法规，特别是月球设施的特征，这种设施是由地球和月球资源构成的材料的混合物。然后，本文指出了《登记公约》和《月球协定》之间的模糊地带。后者将月球及其资源指定为人类的共同遗产，在包含月球资源的设施中，月球及其资源与前者相矛盾，因为登记国对空间物体具有管辖权，这使人们对已登记物体的管辖权产生疑问从月球的一部分。提出了根据《外层空间条约》可能作出的解释以及进一步的适当解决方案。然后，在放弃综合设施的基础上，通过讨论相关责任来发展这个问题。对在月球上建造的设施的管辖权的分析为确定潜在责任提供了可能的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号