【24h】

Comparison Of Local And Global Undirected Graphical Models

机译:本地和全局无向图形模型的比较

获取原文

摘要

CRFs are discriminative undirected models which are globally normalized. Global normalization preserves CRFs from the label bias problem which most local models suffer from. Recently proposed co-occurrence rate networks (CRNs) are also discriminative undirected models. In contrast to CRFs, CRNs are locally normalized. It was established that CRNs are immune to the label bias problem even they are local models. In this paper, we further compare ECRNs (using fully empirical relative frequencies, not by support vector regression) and CRFs. The connection between Co-occurrence Rate, which is the exponential function of pointwise mutual information, and Copulas is built in continuous case. Also they are further evaluated statistically by experiments.
机译:CRF是具有歧视性的无向模型,已被全局标准化。全局归一化使CRF免受大多数本地模型所遭受的标签偏差问题的困扰。最近提出的共现率网络(CRN)也是可判别的无向模型。与CRF相反,CRN是本地归一化的。已经确定,即使CRN是局部模型,它们也不受标签偏差问题的影响。在本文中,我们进一步比较了ECRN(使用完全经验的相对频率,而不是通过支持向量回归)和CRF。共现率(即逐点互信息的指数函数)与Copulas之间的联系是在连续情况下建立的。此外,还可以通过实验对它们进行进一步的统计评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号