首页> 外文会议>Indian conference on logic and its applications >The Relevance of Relevance to Relevance Logic
【24h】

The Relevance of Relevance to Relevance Logic

机译:关联对关联逻辑的关联

获取原文

摘要

I explore the question of whether the concept of relevance is relevant to the study of what Anderson and Belnap call "relevance logic." The answer should be "Of course!" But there are some twists and turns, as is shown by the fact that it has taken over 50 years to get here. Despite protests by R. K. Meyer that the concept of relevance is not part of what he calls "relevant logic," I suggest and defend interpreting the Routley-Meyer ternary accessibility relation using information states a, b, c, so Rabc means "in the context a, b is relevant to c." Motivations are provided from Sperber and Wilson's work in linguistics on relevance.
机译:我探讨了相关性概念是否与Anderson和Belnap称为“相关性逻辑”的研究相关的问题。答案应该是“当然!”但是有些曲折,事实证明,这已经花费了50多年的时间。尽管RK Meyer抗议相关性概念不是他所谓的“相关逻辑”的一部分,但我建议并捍卫使用信息状态a,b,c解释Routley-Meyer三元可访问性关系,因此Rabc的意思是“在上下文中a,b与c有关。” Sperber和Wilson的语言学研究提供了相关性的动机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号