• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>IAEE international conference;International Association for Energy Economics >THE ROLE OF THE WORLD BANK IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKET LIBERALISATION PROCESS AND NETWORKS OF FINANCING GENERATION: CASE STUDY OF THAILAND AND VIETNAM FROM 1957 TO 2013
【24h】

THE ROLE OF THE WORLD BANK IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKET LIBERALISATION PROCESS AND NETWORKS OF FINANCING GENERATION: CASE STUDY OF THAILAND AND VIETNAM FROM 1957 TO 2013

机译：世界银行在电力市场自由化过程和融资网络中的作用：以1957年至2013年泰国和越南为例

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Unbundling and liberalization of electricity systems has been the paradigm model used by policy makers and international institutions as the essential framework for developing the sector and dealing with issues including inadequate pricing, lack of capacity, fiscal constraints, efficiency problems, and underinvestment. The process has been actively led by the World Bank. The research collects empirical data to explore the World Bank financing networks (include lending, granting, guaranteeing and channelling) in the electricity sector in Thailand and Vietnam. Public sector actors including government institutions and SOEs are the dominant recipients and create highly dense connections in the financing network whilst the network of private sector actors is much more sparse and receive much less fund from financiers. Funds for Market Reforms account for 38% (in Vietnam) and 44% (in Thailand) of total financing from World Bank, which is comparable to other developmental, infrastructure funds. These loans are directed to the government institutions as borrowers, implementers and end users. The finding puts a question on what key role the World Bank should play in supporting developing countries. The Bank could be much more efficient at initiating connections, guaranteeing and building technical capacity or legitimacy than being the main financial source.
机译：电力系统的捆绑和自由化一直是决策者和国际机构使用的范式模型，作为发展该部门和处理价格不足，容量不足，财政约束，效率问题和投资不足等问题的基本框架。世界银行一直在积极推动这一进程。该研究收集了经验数据，以探索世界银行在泰国和越南电力部门的融资网络（包括贷款，赠款，担保和渠道安排）。公共部门参与者（包括政府机构和国有企业）是主要的接受者，它们在融资网络中建立了高度紧密的联系，而私营部门参与者的网络则稀疏得多，而从融资者那里获得的资金却少得多。市场改革基金占世界银行总融资的38％（越南）和44％（泰国），与其他发展性基础设施基金相当。这些贷款是作为借款人，实施者和最终用户直接提供给政府机构的。该发现对世界银行在支持发展中国家中应发挥的关键作用提出了疑问。世行在建立联系，保证和建设技术能力或合法性方面可能比作为主要资金来源更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号