• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议> >NEW DEVELOPMENT OF CHINA’S NATIONAL EVALUATION STANDARD FOR GREEN BUILDING (ESGB-2014): A COMPARISON OF ESGB 2014 TO ESGB 2006
【24h】

NEW DEVELOPMENT OF CHINA’S NATIONAL EVALUATION STANDARD FOR GREEN BUILDING (ESGB-2014): A COMPARISON OF ESGB 2014 TO ESGB 2006

机译：中国绿色建筑国家评估标准的新发展（ESGB-2014）：2014年ESGB与2006年ESGB的比较

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OverviewGreen building is an important embodiment of sustainable development strategy, and evaluation system is asignificant tool to guide the construction and operation of green building. Since 1990s, many countries havedeveloped a number of green building assessment tools, such as LEED in the USA, BREEAM in the UK, CASBEEin Japan and SBTool, etc. In 2006, China published the first National Evaluation Standard for Green Building(ESGB), which soon became the most widely spread evaluation system in the country. With the fast growth ofurbanization, ESGB 2006 version no longer meets the current needs and requires an update. Based on theimplementation outcomes of ESGB 2006 and expert opinions, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-ruralDevelopment published a new version of ESGB in 2014 (ESGB 2014).MethodsThis research reviews the previous cases of buildings accredited with ESGB 2006 and collects the facts and data toexplain the implementation results and identifies its weakness of the ESGB 2006. A comparative analysis of theESGB 2014 with ESGB 2006 is based on an in-depth overview of both ESGB 2014 and ESGB 2006. Thecomparison results shows the improvement of the current ESGB 2014 in details, i.e., evaluated object, stagepartition, weighted value, structure, indicators, etc.A case study is followed by choosing one building project to evaluate and calculate the green building accreditationaccording to both ESGB 2014 and ESGB 2006, and demonstrate the differences and development of ESGB 2014.ResultsThe 2014 version is more than a continuation of the former version. It adds a new category – “ConstructionManagement” to cover the life cycle, and adjusts several credits more clearly. In the 2006 version there’s noquantitative credits, the evaluation results of credits are ‘qualified’ or ‘unqualified’. The improvement of ESGB2014 establishes a multi-level analysis model, and adopts AHP & Delphi methods to give weights to the categoriesand selected credits. It also introduces several technique rules to guide the evaluation. The improvement of ESGB2014 gives a comprehensive reflection of the direction and development of green building in China.ConclusionsThe comaprison results will show the differences and effectiveness of the ESGB 2014, in comparison to ESGB2006, and demonstrat the development trend of ESGB in China. For example, stakeholders involvement, integrateddesign process, contents extension, etc.
机译：概述 绿色建筑是可持续发展战略的重要体现，评估体系是可持续发展战略的重要组成部分。 指导绿色建筑施工和运营的重要工具。自1990年代以来，许多国家/地区 开发了许多绿色建筑评估工具，例如美国的LEED，英国的BREEAM，CASBEE 日本和SBTool等。2006年，中国发布了第一个《绿色建筑国家评估标准》 （ESGB），很快成为该国使用最广泛的评估系统。随着快速增长 城镇化方面，ESGB 2006版本不再满足当前需求，需要进行更新。基于 住房和城乡建设部2006年ESGB实施成果和专家意见 开发部在2014年发布了新版本的ESGB（ESGB 2014）。 方法 这项研究回顾了ESGB 2006认可的先前建筑物案例，并收集了事实和数据，以 解释实施结果并确定ESGB 2006的不足。 具有ESGB 2006的ESGB 2014基于对ESGB 2014和ESGB 2006的深入概述。 比较结果详细显示了当前ESGB 2014的改进，即评估对象，阶段 分区，加权值，结构，指标等 案例研究之后，选择一个建筑项目来评估和计算绿色建筑认证 根据ESGB 2014和ESGB 2006，并展示了ESGB 2014的差异和发展。 结果 2014版不仅是旧版的延续。它增加了一个新类别–“建筑 “管理”以覆盖整个生命周期，并更清晰地调整几个学分。在2006年的版本中，没有 定量学分，学分的评估结果为“合格”或“不合格”。 ESGB的改进 2014年建立了多层次的分析模型，并采用AHP和Delphi方法对类别进行权重 和选定的学分。它还介绍了一些技术规则来指导评估。 ESGB的改进 2014年全面反映了中国绿色建筑的方向和发展。 结论 comaprison结果将显示与ESGB相比ESGB 2014的差异和有效性 2006年，展示了ESGB在中国的发展趋势。例如，利益相关者的参与，整合 设计过程，内容扩展等

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号