首页> 外文会议>Geotechnical frontiers >Comparison of a Modified Transient Plane Source and Transient Line Source Techniques for Measuring the Thermal Conductivity of Two Sands
【24h】

Comparison of a Modified Transient Plane Source and Transient Line Source Techniques for Measuring the Thermal Conductivity of Two Sands

机译:用于测量两岩导热率的改进的瞬态平面源和瞬态线源技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Experiments were conducted to compare two laboratory techniques for measuring thermal conductivity of unsaturated soils: (1) a modified transient plane source (MTPS) method for nondestructive measurements using a planar, interfacial heat reflectance sensor; and (2) a transient line source (TLS) method utilizing a single-probe heat source. Thermal conductivity and thermal conductivity dry out curves (TCDCs) were measured for two sands, including a poorly graded sand, and a well-graded sand with silt. The MTPS sensor resulted in larger thermal conductivity values than the TLS sensor for pore water saturations greater than 50%. At low pore water saturation, the MTPS sensor potentially underestimates thermal conductivity due to poor sensor-soil contact potentially resulting from the absence of water bridges between the sensor and soil surface.
机译:进行了实验以比较用于测量不饱和土的导热率的两种实验室技术:(1)使用平面,界面热反射传感器的非破坏性测量改进的瞬态平面源(MTPS)方法; (2)利用单探针热源的瞬态线源(TLS)方法。热导率和导热率干燥曲线(TCDC)为两个砂体测量,包括较差的沙子,以及淤泥的良好分级砂。 MTPS传感器导致比TLS传感器大于50%的TLS传感器。在低孔隙水饱和度下,由于在传感器和土壤表面之间没有水桥的缺陷导致的传感器 - 土壤接触差,MTPS传感器可能低估导热率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号