首页> 外文会议>Geotechnical frontiers >Comparison of a Modified Transient Plane Source and Transient Line Source Techniques for Measuring the Thermal Conductivity of Two Sands
【24h】

Comparison of a Modified Transient Plane Source and Transient Line Source Techniques for Measuring the Thermal Conductivity of Two Sands

机译:改进的瞬态平面源和瞬态线源技术测量两砂热导率的比较

获取原文

摘要

Experiments were conducted to compare two laboratory techniques for measuring thermal conductivity of unsaturated soils: (1) a modified transient plane source (MTPS) method for nondestructive measurements using a planar, interfacial heat reflectance sensor; and (2) a transient line source (TLS) method utilizing a single-probe heat source. Thermal conductivity and thermal conductivity dry out curves (TCDCs) were measured for two sands, including a poorly graded sand, and a well-graded sand with silt. The MTPS sensor resulted in larger thermal conductivity values than the TLS sensor for pore water saturations greater than 50%. At low pore water saturation, the MTPS sensor potentially underestimates thermal conductivity due to poor sensor-soil contact potentially resulting from the absence of water bridges between the sensor and soil surface.
机译:进行了实验以比较两种用于测量非饱和土壤热导率的实验室技术:(1)使用平面界面热反射传感器进行无损测量的改进瞬态平面源(MTPS)方法; (2)利用单探头热源的瞬态线源(TLS)方法。测量了两种沙子的热导率和热导率干枯曲线(TCDC),其中包括低等级砂和高等级粉砂。对于孔隙水饱和度大于50%的情况,MTPS传感器的热导率值比TLS传感器大。在孔隙水饱和度低的情况下,由于传感器与土壤接触不良,MTPS传感器可能会低估导热系数,这可能是由于传感器与土壤表面之间不存在水桥造成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号