• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International conference on reliability, safety, and security of railway systems >Are Standards an Ambiguity-Free Reference for Product Validation?
【24h】

Are Standards an Ambiguity-Free Reference for Product Validation?

机译：标准是否是产品验证的无歧义参考？

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The increased use of standards as references for safety-critical applications is drawing the attention of researchers on the fact that the responsibility for the safety of standard-compliant systems may depend not only on developers and assessors, but also on the standards themselves. This paper is focused particularly on some quality aspects of standard clauses, i.e., the natural language statements that are expressed by the standards, and to which a standard-compliant process or product is required to adhere. Various railway standards are considered, and some linguistic issues, potentially leading to ambiguity of clause interpretation, are discovered with the aid of natural language processing (NLP) tools. Real cases of problems in clause interpretation, taken from industrial experience, are reported, to show the possible impact in products and processes that must be validated against such clauses, and to justify the importance of the analysis.
机译：标准越来越多地用作对安全性至关重要的应用的参考，这引起了研究人员的注意，即对符合标准的系统的安全性的责任不仅取决于开发商和评估者，还取决于标准本身。本文特别关注标准条款的某些质量方面，即标准所表达的自然语言陈述，并要求遵循符合标准的过程或产品。考虑了各种铁路标准，并借助自然语言处理（NLP）工具发现了一些可能导致子句解释含糊不清的语言问题。报告了从行业经验中得出的条款解释中存在问题的实际案例，以显示必须针对此类条款进行验证的产品和过程可能产生的影响，并证明分析的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号