• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>2007年战略管理国际会议 >Surface and Essence for Sustainable Development of Chinese Publishing Industry
【24h】

Surface and Essence for Sustainable Development of Chinese Publishing Industry

机译：中国出版业可持续发展的表面与本质

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The paper, through falsification, evaluates the necessity of the preposition of "Sustainable Development of Chinese Publishing Industry". Because it is very difficult to say that the whole industry exists in the pure form of a nation or a country. "Chinese publishing industry" cannot clearly stands for "the national one", "the one with Chinese nationality", "the one owned by Chinese capital" or "the one with Chinese blood in the global scale". It is, to a certain extent, of great significance to adopt "sustainable development" to a specific industry relevant to the whole development. However, it does not mean that the development of any industry has the research value on "sustainable development". All kinds of public information needed by the mass through the publishing carrier are in the increasing rather than decreasing state. The whole publishing industry develops with the development of society and the increase for the cultural as well as information consumption. Hence, it will never appear such problems as the development crisis of the whole publishing industry, not to mention the sustainable development of the whole publishing industry. The paper proposes that the development of publishing industry and the development of human beings are interrelated with each other. As long as human beings are in the status of sustainable development, the needs for publicly producing and distributing information are inevitably in the status of "sustainable development", which leads to the status of "sustainable development" of publishing industry. The needs are represented at most in the diversification of carrier forms. Therefore, the sustainable development of publishing industry should not be specially discussed.
机译：本文通过伪造，评估“中国出版业可持续发展”介词的必要性。因为很难说整个行业存在于国家或一个国家的纯粹形式。 “中国出版业”不能明确代表“国家一”，“中国国籍”，“中国资本的一个人”或“全球血液中的中国血液”。在一定程度上，采用与整个发展有关的特定行业的“可持续发展”具有重要意义。但是，并不意味着任何行业的发展都具有“可持续发展”的研究价值。通过出版载体的质量所需的各种公共信息在不断增加而不是降低状态。整个出版社随着社会的发展而发展，文化的增加以及信息消费。因此，它永远不会出现这种问题作为整个出版业的发展危机，更不用说整个出版业的可持续发展。本文提出了出版业的发展和人类的发展彼此相互关联。只要人类处于可持续发展的地位，公开生产和分发信息的需求就不可避免地是“可持续发展”的地位，这导致出版业的“可持续发展”的地位。在运营商形式的多样化中最多代表了需求。因此，不应特别讨论出版业的可持续发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号