• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Air and Waste Management Association annual conference and exhibition >Climate Change and Social Change - A Comparison of Regulatory Reform and Socio-Cultural Response to Climate Change Policy in Europe and the United States
【24h】

Climate Change and Social Change - A Comparison of Regulatory Reform and Socio-Cultural Response to Climate Change Policy in Europe and the United States

机译：气候变化与社会变迁 - 对欧洲和美国气候变化政策的监管改革与社会文化应对的比较

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the initial debates in Kyoto in 1997, climate change has been a subject of significant discussion, worldwide. The development of a regulatory framework to limit the impact of climate change has invited extensive political debate in the United States (US), though the introduction of the same or similar regulatory reforms have encountered very little opposition or discussion in Europe. The European Union (EU) has accepted climate change and has moved to make changes to prevent or reduce the effects. By contrast, the US has delayed legislative changes, appears reluctant to move in the direction of change, and is currently still debating the details of the research. The US are estimated to emit 15.6% of total worldwide greenhouse gas emissions, whereas the 28 member nations of the EU are estimated to emit 10.9% of total worldwide greenhouse gas emissions. Volumes of scientific study have been completed on the topic, and the US currently has a regulatory framework in place to limit the effects of climate change. Nonetheless, political discussions arguing whether or not to take action on climate change continue to take place. Threats of repeals of existing climate change legislation occur during political debates. Debate on climate change topics are still a common feature of social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter). Even recent and well-funded efforts to provoke American voters into "caring" about climate change have been unsuccessful. Meanwhile, the EU signed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and has since developed and implemented a strategy for climate change that currently effects most citizens in their member states. European leaders have continued to make climate change topics high priority with respect to local legislation. Most recently, the EU has been developing "adaptation strategies" to assist member states in coordinating efforts to reduce and survive the effects of climate change in economic and social populations. Why is there such a difference in average opinions on the seriousness of Climate Change between the people in the United States and Europe? We seek to understand why European countries have taken a lock-step approach to climate change while the US have been more cautious. This paper explores some of the cultural differences and influences that affect Climate Change policy and attitudes in movement toward changes in the US and EU. This paper will seek to compare the differences in attitudes to climate change reforms by examining and comparing the following in the US and Europe: 1. Timeline of climate change milestones (research, international debate) 2. Timeline of follow-up actions 3. Key differences in debate topics 4. Introduction of regulatory reforms and policies associated with climate change 5. Current status of climate change reforms 6. Media discussions on climate change 7. Changes due to climate change initiatives 8. Attitudes to change, socio-cultural factors for attitudes 9. History of social change.
机译：自1997年京都初步辩论以来，气候变化一直是全世界重要讨论的主题。监管框架的制定限制气候变化的影响邀请美国（美国）在美国（美国）的广泛政治辩论，尽管引入了相同或类似的监管改革，在欧洲遇到了很少的反对或讨论。欧洲联盟（欧盟）已接受气候变化，并迁移以改变以防止或减少效果。相比之下，美国延迟了立法变动，似乎不愿意在变革方向上移动，目前仍在争论研究的细节。据估计，美国估计占全球温室气体排放总量的15.6％，而28欧盟成员国估计占全球温室气体排放总量的10.9％。科学研究卷已经完成了该主题，美国目前有一个监管框架，以限制气候变化的影响。尽管如此，政治讨论是否争论是否继续采取行动气候变化。在政治辩论期间发生废除现有气候变化立法的威胁。关于气候变化主题的辩论仍然是社交媒体的共同特征（例如，Facebook，Twitter）。即使是最近和良好的资助努力，让美国选民进入关于气候变化的“关怀”一直不成功。与此同时，欧盟于1997年签署了京都议定书，自发达并实施了目前其成员国中大多数公民的气候变化策略。欧洲领导人继续使气候变化高度优先于当地立法。最近，欧盟一直在发展“适应策略”，以协助成员国协调减少和生存在经济和社会人口气候变化影响的努力。为什么有关美国和欧洲人民之间的气候变化严重性的平均意见的平均意见差异？我们寻求理解为什么欧洲国家对气候变化采取锁定方法，而美国更加谨慎。本文探讨了一些文化差异和影响，影响气候变化政策和对美国和欧盟变动的态度。本文将寻求通过检查和继美国和欧洲比较的态度应对气候变化改革的差异比较：1.时间轴气候变化的里程碑（研究，国际辩论）2的后续行动3.主要时间轴在辩论主题4.与气候变化相关5.当前气候变化的改革变化引起气候变化的举措8.态度变化对气候变化的7 6.媒体讨论的地位监管改革和政策的介绍不同，社会文化因素态度9.社会变革的历史。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号