首页> 外文会议>European Distance and E-Learning Network annual conference >DIGITAL LEARNING IN IRISH HIGHER EDUCATION: INTEGRATING STRATEGIC AND LEADERSHIP PERSPECTIVES INTO A ROADMAP FOR DIGITAL CAPACITY
【24h】

DIGITAL LEARNING IN IRISH HIGHER EDUCATION: INTEGRATING STRATEGIC AND LEADERSHIP PERSPECTIVES INTO A ROADMAP FOR DIGITAL CAPACITY

机译:爱尔兰高等教育中的数字学习:将战略和领导观点纳入数字能力路线图

获取原文

摘要

Digital learning finds its way, as if by stealth, into the mainstream of higher education. As educators, however, we are aware of a persistence of traditional teaching and assessment practices. Taking innovative and potentially transformative pedagogical practices to scale is a well known but poorly addressed challenge. Bottom up approaches to digital learning, however, often give rise to an unsustainable multiplicity of practices across disciplines and faculties, usually layered on top of existing practices rather than replacing them. On the other hand, top down institutional initiatives, intended for mainstream adoption, are often seen by pedagogical innovators as driving conservative or constraining decisions about technologies, platforms and learning spaces. Addressing this bottom-up, top-down dilemma is today's key challenge for innovation and modernisation of higher education. Our paper looks at one facet of this challenge, and how the perceptions of those in academic leadership roles are informing discourse and strategy development for digital learning in Irish higher education. In particular it looks at how leaders' insights have contributed to the development by the (Irish) National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education of a 'Roadmap for Enhancement in a Digital World 2015-2017', as a blueprint for the integration of digital learning and digital pedagogy consistently and at scale across the higher education sector as a whole. Academics in senior/strategic roles can provide unique insights into the challenges of scale and sustainability of digital learning innovation. On the one hand, with their influence over strategic direction, budgets and the seed funding of innovative pilots, they can create an enabling environment. On the other hand, the imperative to manage scarce resources and to ensure that institutional reputation and quality remain demonstrably on a sound footing can make it difficult to choose between competing demands for up-scaling, mainstreaming or simply sustaining successful pilots. Staff in these roles embodies the bottom-up, top-down dilemma and the development of the Digital Capacity Roadmap provided an opportunity to discuss this with them on a one-to-one basis, using a semi-structured interview approach. The insights gained were then cross-referenced with institutional funding agreements introduced for the first time in 2014, 'Mission-Based Performance Compacts', covering the full range of HEI activities, including the environment for teaching and learning. While many innovative digital learning projects and initiatives are evident in Irish HEIs, it has not been easy to assess their overall impact or to place them in the wider context of institutional strategic and leadership positions. By juxtaposing the interview process with staff in senior/strategic roles and the analysis of Compacts, it has been possible to gain a fruitful insight into how a range of innovative practices are viewed top-down. Taking as a model, Trawler's continuum from incrementalism (reform agenda) to reinvention (transformational agenda) a rich and complementary picture emerged of the day-to-day reality of fostering learning innovation in Irish HEIs. Dominant themes include strong support for academic staff CPD, for the professionalisation of the teaching role and for collaborative HE sector-level actions to deliver the required CPD. Much emphasis was placed on what was described as 'appropriate' integration of digital technologies, but there was agreement that current approaches are for the most part conservative ('doing the same in the old way but better). While learning innovation (digital) is taking place and bottom-up innovations are facilitated, there is little appetite as yet for strategic (top down) initiatives. There is broad agreement, however, that matters related to digital or online learning and digital capacity generally should be brought systematically into the mainstream of institutional quality assurance processes. Ultimately, the view from staff in senior/strategic roles is optimistic, but with wide agreement that clarity is urgently needed about the overarching vision and goals for digital learning in higher education nationally. Informed, concerted effort is required to embed quality assured digital learning consistently and at scale within Irish HEIs and the recently published Roadmap provides the necessary strategic vision and focus in a manner that is grounded in actionable implementation items and guidelines about how to address them.
机译:数字学习似乎已经悄悄地进入了高等教育的主流。但是,作为教育者,我们意识到传统教学和评估实践的持续存在。大规模采用创新的,可能具有变革性的教学方法是众所周知的,但解决起来却很困难。但是,自下而上的数字学习方法通​​常会导致跨学科和院系的实践的不可持续多样性,通常是在现有实践之上,而不是取代现有实践。另一方面,旨在被主流采用的自上而下的机构举措经常被教学创新者视为推动对技术,平台和学习空间的保守或约束性决定。解决自下而上,自上而下的难题是当今高等教育创新和现代化的关键挑战。我们的论文着眼于这一挑战的方面,以及在学术领导角色中的人们的看法如何为爱尔兰高等教育中的数字学习提供话语和策略发展。特别是,它探讨了领导者的见识如何为(爱尔兰)全国高等教育教与学论坛提供的“ 2015-2017年数字世界增强路线图”为发展做出的贡献。整个高等教育部门始终如一地大规模整合数字学习和数字教学法。担任高级/战略职务的学者可以就数字学习创新的规模和可持续性挑战提供独特的见解。一方面,由于它们对战略方向,预算和创新飞行员的种子资金的影响,它们可以创造有利的环境。另一方面,当务之急是管理稀缺资源并确保在良好的基础上保持良好的机构声誉和质量,这使得很难在扩大规模,主流化或仅仅维持成功的飞行员的竞争需求之间做出选择。这些角色的员工体现了自下而上,自上而下的困境,数字能力路线图的发展提供了使用半结构化访谈方法与他们一对一讨论的机会。然后,将所获得的见解与2014年首次推出的机构资助协议“基于任务的绩效协议”进行交叉引用,该协议涵盖了所有HEI活动,包括教学和学习环境。尽管爱尔兰高校中有许多创新的数字学习项目和计划,但要评估它们的总体影响或将其置于机构战略和领导职位的更广泛背景下并不容易。通过与担任高级/战略职位的员工进行面谈,并分析《契约》,可以对如何自上而下地看待一系列创新实践获得丰硕的见解。作为模型,Trawler从增量主义(改革议程)到重塑(转型议程)的连续体,展现了在爱尔兰高校中促进学习创新的日常现实的丰富而互补的图景。占主导地位的主题包括对教职员工CPD,教学角色的专业化以及HE部门级合作以提供所需CPD的有力支持。人们把重点放在所谓的“适当的”数字技术集成上,但是人们一致认为,当前的方法在很大程度上是保守的(“以旧的方式做,但效果更好”)。在进行学习创新(数字)和促进自下而上的创新的同时,对战略(自上而下)计划的需求还很小。但是,人们广泛同意,与数字或在线学习和数字能力有关的问题通常应系统地纳入机构质量保证流程的主流。最终,担任高级/战略职位的工作人员的看法是乐观的,但广泛同意,迫切需要明确全国高等教育数字学习的总体愿景和目标。需要采取明智的一致努力,才能在爱尔兰的HEI中始终如一地大规模嵌入质量保证的数字学习,并且最近发布的路线图以必要的战略构想和重点为基础,以可行的实施项目和有关如何解决这些问题的指南为基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号