• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Technology, systems ships >Title: 'Realizing Flexible Ships: Lessons from Allies to Improve the U.S. Shipbuilding Affordability, Capacity, and Schedule'
【24h】

Title: 'Realizing Flexible Ships: Lessons from Allies to Improve the U.S. Shipbuilding Affordability, Capacity, and Schedule'

机译：标题：“实现灵活的船舶：来自盟国的经验教训，以改善美国的造船能力，能力和进度”

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Flexible and adaptive ship designs that are properly built and configured in a modular fashion save production and maintenance costs and provide rapid upgrade capability. U.S.-allied navies have adopted a modular approach to accommodate mission payloads for many currently deployed ships and future ships in development. The purpose of this paper is to present innovative concepts and practical lessons from South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan that could assist the U.S. Navy in quickly recognizing the benefits of introducing Flexible Warship design features and modular payloads into new and existing ships. These flexible features or enablers will achieve improved affordability, extend service life, increase deployment time, and expand mission capability. Our Pacific allies' ship building programs have been summarized from a global view: 1.Top Shipbuilding Tonnage Producers 2.US Allies with Rapid Shipbuilding Capacity 3.Destroyers in Korea and Japan using Modular Weapons Features for Production 4.Taiwan Navy's 16 warship programs plus its Coast Guard 169-cutter acquisitions in 2018 5.Three Taiwan Modular Warship examples: DDG(X), FFG-Cutter, and Corvette-Cutter 6.Larger Hull Margins Improve Ship Acquisition Affordability, Schedule, and Capability 7.Flexible ships need Flexible Modular Combat Systems Traditionally, when U.S. surface ships are designed to the lowest weight and highest equipment density with little upgrade margin, they are often considered an "optimized" procurement choice. This weight-based cost model often results in expensive ships with short service lives, long deployment delays, and lack of upgradability. By building less dense ships and using modular weapons payloads, Pacific allies have chosen these characteristics for both their new ships and their purchases of older soon-to-be-decommissioned ships to significantly increase their service life after upgrades. These three Pacific allies' approaches for evaluating flexible ship design features and building affordable ships can supplement traditional U.S. surface ship development. It is important for the U.S. Navy to plan, design, build, and operate flexible warships with an understanding of both the up front cost of installing flexible architecture and the cost savings these features enable throughout the ship's life cycle.
机译：以模块化方式正确构建和配置的灵活，适应性强的船舶设计节省了生产和维护成本，并提供了快速升级功能。美国盟国海军已采用模块化方法，为许多目前部署的舰艇和未来发展中的舰艇提供任务有效载荷。本文的目的是介绍来自韩国，日本和台湾的创新概念和实践经验，可以帮助美国海军迅速认识到将柔性战舰设计功能和模块化有效载荷引入新船和现有船上的好处。这些灵活的功能或促成因素将提高负担能力，延长使用寿命，增加部署时间并扩展任务能力。我们从全球角度总结了我们太平洋盟军的造船计划：1.造船吨位最高的制造商2.具有快速造船能力的美国盟军3.使用模块化武器生产的韩国和日本驱逐舰4.台湾海军的16艘军舰计划以及在2018年完成了对海岸警卫队169艘切割机的收购5.台湾模块化战舰的三个例子：DDG（X），FFG切割机和Corvette-Cutter 6.更大的船体利润提高了船舶收购的负担能力，时间表和能力7.柔性船需要柔性模块化作战系统传统上，当美国水面舰艇设计成重量最轻，设备密度最高，升级幅度很小时，通常被认为是“优化”的采购选择。这种基于重量的成本模型通常会导致昂贵的船舶使用寿命短，部署延迟长且缺乏可升级性。通过建造密度较小的舰船并使用模块化武器有效载荷，太平洋盟国为新舰舰和购买较老的即将退役的舰舰选择了这些特性，从而显着提高了升级后的使用寿命。这三个太平洋盟国评估灵活的船舶设计特征和建造负担得起的船舶的方法可以补充美国传统的水面舰艇的发展。对于美国海军来说，计划，设计，建造和操作挠性战舰非常重要，要了解安装挠性建筑的前期成本以及这些功能在整个舰船生命周期中节省的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号