• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference >Model for Measuring the Effect of Utility Interventions on Change of Consumer Behavior on Energy Savings: A Study Based on Sri Lankan Domestic Sector
【24h】

Model for Measuring the Effect of Utility Interventions on Change of Consumer Behavior on Energy Savings: A Study Based on Sri Lankan Domestic Sector

机译：公用事业干预对消费者行为改变对节能的影响的度量模型：基于斯里兰卡国内部门的研究

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) introduces different intervention mechanisms to conserve electricity from time to time. These interventions mainly include financial incentives, technical supports, and regulatory influences etc. But utility's sources reveal that those interventions are ineffective and waste of resources in the long run. Therefore, this paper examines the possible causes of such failures and suitable remedial actions. The proposed new model bridges the existing knowledge gap between the theoretical and empirical implications of energy conservation. Findings show that utilities have failed to match incentives, tariff regimes, regulations, and technology among different levels of consumer segments scientifically. Especially, the consumer groups belong to a monthly average consumption of 31- 90kWh, 91-120kWh, and 121-180 kWh are having a very high potential for energy conservation via various incentive schemes whereas consumers above 181kWh units have to be motivated towards energy conservation through various tariffs and regulatory influences. The consumers below 30kWh units bear no sense of responsibility and not even respond to generic energy conservation aspects or to regulatory regimes. Therefore, specific financial transfers and employment opportunities need to be introduced on this segment which is at the bottom of the pyramid.
机译：锡兰电力委员会（CEB）引入了不同的干预机制，以不时节约电力。这些干预措施主要包括经济激励措施，技术支持和监管影响等。但是，公用事业部门的消息来源表明，从长远来看，这些干预措施是无效的并且浪费资源。因此，本文研究了此类故障的可能原因以及适当的补救措施。提出的新模型弥合了节能理论和经验之间的现有知识鸿沟。调查结果表明，公用事业未能在科学上使激励措施，关税制度，法规和技术与不同层次的消费者细分相匹配。尤其是，这些消费群体分别具有31-90kWh，91-120kWh和121-180kWh的月平均消费量，通过各种激励计划具有很高的节能潜力，而181kWh以上的消费者则必须积极推动节能工作。通过各种关税和监管影响。低于30kWh机组的用户没有责任感，甚至对通用节能方面或监管制度也没有反应。因此，需要在金字塔底部的这一部分引入特定的财务转移和就业机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号