首页> 外文会议>IMEKO World Congress >METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE CALIBRATIONS: A CASE STUDY ON THE INTERLABORATORIAL COMPARISON PROGRAM.

【24h】

METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE CALIBRATIONS: A CASE STUDY ON THE INTERLABORATORIAL COMPARISON PROGRAM.

机译：评估校准的方法：对互联比较方案的案例研究。

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This work presents a method to evaluate measurement results of calibrations of an itinerary energy standard (Wh) performed by laboratories that participate in an interlaboratorial comparison program. It is based in the methodology of linearization of the normal function distribution. This tool compares data of a laboratory under analysis to data of the reference laboratory using beta values of each laboratory within a specific period of the program. If any of these measures is outside stipulated ranges it is a sign that the laboratory under analysis needs to investigate its process.

机译：该工作提出了一种方法来评估由参与互联网比较计划的实验室执行的行程能量标准（WH）的校准测量结果。它基于正常功能分布的线性化方法。该工具将实验室的数据进行了分析，对参考实验室的数据使用每个实验室的β值在程序的特定时期内。如果这些措施中的任何一个规定的范围是一个标志，实验室正在分析需要调查其过程。

著录项

来源
《IMEKO World Congress》|2009年||共4页
会议地点
作者
Sousa J.J.L.; Leitao L.T.S.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类 TB9-53;
关键词
Beta values; Beta ranges;

机译：Beta值;β范围;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Uncertainty Evaluation and Validation of a Comparison Methodology to Perform In-house Calibration of Platinum Resistance Thermometers using a Monte Carlo Method [J] . A. Silva Ribeiro, J. Alves e Sousa, C. Oliveira Costa, International Journal of Thermophysics . 2008,第3期

机译：使用蒙特卡洛方法进行铂电阻温度计内部校准的比较方法的不确定性评估和验证
2. Uncertainty Evaluation and Validation of a Comparison Methodology to Perform In-house Calibration of Platinum Resistance Thermometers using a Monte Carlo Method [J] . A. Silva Ribeiro, J. Alves e Sousa, C. Oliveira Costa, International Journal of Thermophysics . 2008,第3期

机译：使用蒙特卡洛方法进行铂电阻温度计内部校准的比较方法的不确定性评估和验证
3. Comparison of composite measure methodologies for rewarding quality of care: an analysis from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines program. [J] . Eapen ZJ, Fonarow GC, Dai D, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes . 2011,第6期

机译：奖励护理质量的综合措施方法的比较：美国心脏协会的“获得指导原则”计划的分析。
4. METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE CALIBRATIONS: A CASE STUDY ON THE INTERLABORATORIAL COMPARISON PROGRAM. [C] . Sousa J.J.L., Leitao L.T.S. IMEKO World Congress . 2009

机译：评估校准的方法：对互联比较方案的案例研究。
5. Comparison of Bayesian calibration methodologies for climate system models. [D] . Hauser, Tristan. 2009

机译：气候系统模型的贝叶斯校准方法的比较。
6. A comparison of statistical emulation methodologies for multi‐wave calibration of environmental models [O] . James M. Salter, Daniel Williamson -1

机译：统计仿真方法在环境模型多波校正中的比较
7. Vicarious Calibration Based Cross Calibration of Solar Reflective Channels of Radiometers Onboard Remote Sensing Satellite and Evaluation of Cross Calibration Accuracy through Band-to-Band Data Comparisons [O] . Kohei Arai 2015

机译：基于替代校准的遥感辐射计太阳反射通道的交叉校准和通过带间数据比较评估交叉校准精度
8. Controller Teamwork Evaluation and Assessment Methodology: A Scenario Calibration Study [R] . Bailey, L. L. , Broach, D. M. , Thompson, R. C. , 1999

机译：控制器团队评估和评估方法：场景校准研究

METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE CALIBRATIONS: A CASE STUDY ON THE INTERLABORATORIAL COMPARISON PROGRAM.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅