• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>MEDINFO >A Comparison of Two Principal Systems for Monitoring of Technology-Induced Errors in Electronic Health Records
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Principal Systems for Monitoring of Technology-Induced Errors in Electronic Health Records

机译：两种主要系统监测电子健康记录中的技术诱导误差的比较

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Current methods for monitoring harm caused by health information technology (HIT) are minimal, even if there are known risks associated with the use of HIT. Monitoring is predominantly based on voluntary reporting using generic patient safety adverse events reporting systems. Another important means for monitoring technology-induced errors is a health authority reporting system. International oversight systems have medical devices' related software's adverse event and failure reporting models, but these systems differ due to differencies in the legislation. The protocol for this study included an electronic database literature search and the eliciting of information for study purposes from the literature. The purpose is to provide a scoping review focused on two types of systems and provide implications for monitoring technology-induced errors in the future. The analysis revealed not only differences, but also similarities between these systems which raises the question of these systems' effectiviness due to overlapping goals in collecting data.
机译：目前用于监测由健康信息技术（命中）造成的伤害的方法是最小的，即使有与使用的使用相关的风险。监测主要基于使用普通患者安全不良事件报告系统的自愿报告。监测技术引起的错误的另一个重要手段是卫生管理局报告系统。国际监督系统具有医疗设备的相关软件的不良事件和故障报告模式，但这些系统因立法中的差异而异。本研究的议定书包括电子数据库文献搜索和诱因文献中的学习目的的信息。目的是提供专注于两种类型的系统的范围审查，并为未来监测技术引起的错误提供影响。分析不仅差异，而且由于在收集数据中的重叠目标，这些系统之间的相似性也引起了这些系统的有效性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号