• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>European conference on colour in graphics, imaging, and vision >The Prime Colors of Human Vision Their Prescription for Illumination, Color Printing, Color Photography, Color Television, and Visual Clarity
【24h】

The Prime Colors of Human Vision Their Prescription for Illumination, Color Printing, Color Photography, Color Television, and Visual Clarity

机译：人类视力的主要色调他们的照明，彩色印刷，彩色摄影，彩色电视和视觉清晰度

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since before 1700 the notion was abroad among mankind that three particular colors of light have special significance to human vision. For a long time inchoate, the notion gathered some substance by 1800, and identification of the particular colors, as red, green and violet, began to be clear. Then around 1900 both the notion of three particular colors, and the identity of those colors, fell again into obscurity due to the sudden popularity of a competing notion represented by "transformability of primaries." However, in the last 30 years, the validity of transformation of primaries has been questioned, and evidence adduced suggesting such transformation to be inadvisable, if not meaningless. Meanwhile, the three particular colors of light have been identified with considerable precision, and their function in human vision has become clearer. These matters underlie the present paper. Palmer (1777) attributed trichromacy to "particles of three different kinds" in the retina, rather than to something in the light itself, as did all forerunners. The three kinds of particles respond, Palmer proposed, to three different kinds of light rays, red, yellow and blue. Wunsch (1792) promoted red, green and violet, instead, as best serving to compose all other colors. Young (1802) also proposed three types of retinal particles, each associated with one of the "three principle colours, red, yellow, and blue..." but in 1803 substituted red, green, and violet as the principal colors. Lang writes (1983) "These formulations (of Young's, in the 1803 paper) express very clearly the fundamental difference between his and all earlier trichromatic theories: He did not assume three different kinds of physical rays, but three kinds of sensitive elements in the retina. There is no longer an isomorphism between rays and colors, but an isomorphism between the three kinds of sensitive elements in the retina and the three fundamental color sensations. In other words: The three principal colors do not exist in the outside world of physical radiation, but only in the world of human color sensation. Their existence has its roots in the organization of our visual system...So Young's priority did not lie in his choice of the additive primaries red, green, violet -- here he was anticipated by Wunsch -- nor in the hypothesis of three kinds of sensitive particles in the retina -- this was stated before him by Palmer -- but in the discovery of the fact that trichromacy is uniquely a consequence of the organization of the human visual system."
机译：自从1700年之前，人类之间的概念在国外，三种特定的光颜色对人类视力具有特殊意义。长时间的英雄，这个概念在1800年收集了一些物质，并鉴定了特定的颜色，作为红色，绿色和紫罗兰，开始清楚。然后，大约1900年的三种特殊颜色的概念以及那些颜色的身份，由于“初选性的变革性”表示的竞争概念突然受到普遍的普及，再次陷入默默无闻。然而，在过去的30年里，初审的转型的有效性受到质疑，并且有迹象表明这种转变是不毫无意义的。同时，已经以相当大的精度鉴定了三种特定的光颜色，并且它们在人类视力中的功能变得更加清晰。这些事情提起本文。帕尔默（1777）归因于视网膜中的“三种不同”颗粒的孕级，而不是在光本身中的某些东西，就像所有的先行者一样。三种粒子响应，帕尔默提出，三种不同种类的光线，红色，黄色和蓝色。 Wunsch（1792）促进了红色，绿色和紫罗兰，而是最好的服务，以组成所有其他颜色。年轻（1802）还提出了三种类型的视网膜颗粒，每个颗粒都与“三个原则颜色，红色，黄色和蓝色...”之一相关，但在1803年以1803年取代的红色，绿色和紫罗兰，为主要颜色。郎写（1983）“这些配方（年轻人在1803篇文章中）表达了他和所有早期三色理论之间的根本差异：他没有假设三种不同的物理光线，但是三种敏感元素视网膜。光线和颜色之间不再是同构，但视网膜中的三种敏感元素与三种基本色素之间的同构。换句话说：在外面的身体世界中不存在三种主要颜色辐射，但只有在人类色彩的世界中。他们的存在在我们的视觉系统的组织中有其根源......所以年轻的优先事项并不躺在他选择的添加剂初红，绿色，紫罗兰 - 在这里他是Wunsch预期 - 视网膜中三种敏感粒子的假设 - 这在帕尔默之前在他面前陈述 - 但在发现的事实中，孕级是唯一的缺点人体视觉系统组织的股票。“

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号