首页> 外文会议>International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery >Does approach influence planning and navigation in imageless guided hip resurfacing?
【24h】

Does approach influence planning and navigation in imageless guided hip resurfacing?

机译:None

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Systems available for computer-assisted hip resurfacing mostly differ from each other in the image modalities. Results using fluoroscopic [1] and CT-based systems [2] have been reported. The VectorVision(R) hip SR product (BrainLAB, Heimstetten, Germany) uses an image-less approach, where planning and navigation is based on intraoperatively digitized bony points. In the imageless approach, the entire surface of the neck is supposed to be digitized, but the exposure is determined by the approach used by the surgeon. The different surgical exposures have their own advantages and disadvantages [3,4] and different parts of the world tend to use different exposures for hip surgery. The purpose of our study was to test how different surgical approaches affect the accuracy of imageless navigated resurfacing surgery. Our hypothesis was that difficulty in digitizing certain aspects of the femoral neck would cause differences in planning and navigation.
机译:简介:可用于计算机辅助HIP Resurfacing的系统主要在图像方式中彼此不同。据报道,使用荧光镜[1]和基于CT的系统[2]的结果。 VectorVision(R)HIP SR产品(Brainlab,Heimstetten,Germany)采用更少的图像方法,其中规划和导航基于朝内数字化骨骼点。在图像的方法中,颈部的整个表面应该被数字化,但是通过外科医生使用的方法确定曝光。不同的手术风险有自己的优点和缺点[3,4]和世界的不同部分倾向于使用不同的髋关节手术暴露。我们研究的目的是测试不同的手术方法如何影响图像导航的重锻手术的准确性。我们的假设是难以数字化股骨颈的某些方面会导致规划和导航差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号