• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering >Environmental Footprint of Single-Use Surgical Instruments in Comparison with Multi-Use Surgical Instruments
【24h】

Environmental Footprint of Single-Use Surgical Instruments in Comparison with Multi-Use Surgical Instruments

机译：与多用途外科仪器相比，单用手术器械的环境足迹

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Manufacturers have been driven towards sustainable manufacturing due to various external and internal forces. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is widely used to assess a product's environmental performance in order to meet arising challenges. This research presents the environmental footprint assessment of single-use and multi-use surgical scissors which are manufactured by AESCULAP AG and a single-use surgical scissors produced by a comparable manufacturer. The cradle-to-gate and the cradle-to-grave assessments were conducted to compare the three surgical scissors using the IPCC GWP100 and Eco-indicator 99 methods. A break-even analysis estimates the preference between single-use and multi-use scissors depending on the use scenario.
机译：由于各种外部和内部力量，制造商已经推动了可持续的制造。生命周期评估（LCA）被广泛用于评估产品的环境绩效，以满足引起的挑战。本研究介绍了由Aesculap AG制造的单用和多用途手术剪刀的环境足迹和多用途手术剪刀，并用可比制造商生产的单用手术剪刀制造。进行摇篮到门和摇篮到严重的评估，以使用IPCC GWP100和Eco-Indicator 99方法比较三种外科剪刀。休息甚至分析估计单用和多用剪刀之间的偏好，具体取决于使用方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号