• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology >Comparisons of three inductive pulse power supplies
【24h】

Comparisons of three inductive pulse power supplies

机译：三种归纳脉冲电源的比较

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The energy density of the inductive energy storage systems is one order of magnitude higher than that of the capacitive ones. Therefore they have potential applications in the future. In this paper, three inductive pulse power supply topologies, i.e. STRETCH meat grinder, XRAM, and non-mutual inductance pulse power supply, are discussed in depth. Firstly, their principles are analyzed. Then simulations are made to illustrate the principles and prepare the fundamental data for further comparisons based on a 4 kA charging current, 220µH total inductance system under the environment of Simplorer®8. Five vital indices reflecting their performances from different aspects are proposed in order to ensure objective and comprehensive comparisons. Based on those indices, the advantages and disadvantages are pointed out and some potential improvements are also presented.
机译：电感能量存储系统的能量密度比电容性高的量级高。因此，他们将来有潜在的应用。在本文中，深入讨论了三种感应脉冲电源拓扑，即弹力绞盘，XRAM和非互感脉冲电源。首先，分析了他们的原则。然后，模拟来说明原理，并在简单的4 ka充电电流，220μH总电感系统下，在简单的环境环境下的420μH总电感系统中，准备基本数据。提出了五项重要指数，反映了他们不同方面的表现，以确保客观和全面的比较。基于这些指数，指出了优点和缺点，还提出了一些潜在的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号