• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Society for the Study of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies >Crossover Research: Exploring a Collaborative Mode of Integration
【24h】

Crossover Research: Exploring a Collaborative Mode of Integration

机译：交叉研究：探索合作集成模式

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Integrative research brings disciplines together in new endeavours. Systems biology currently emerges through the integrative research activity of natural science disciplines. Our project, Crossover Research, widens this scope of integration by including philosophy. This chapter discusses our motivation for widening the disciplinary palette and reflects on conditions for such an extension to be productive based on our initial experiences. The functional integration of participating disciplines is a general challenge for systems biology. We suggest that philosophy (or any socio-humanist discipline) can be integrated on equal terms as any other contributing field of systems biology. The challenge of integrating philosophical research need not be of a different kind. The rationale for integrating socio-humanist disciplines expressed in dominant existing approaches is biased towards the professional interests of the humanist. We argue the case by discussing the approaches of CTA and RTTA. We then articulate how our own attempts at conjoined, "crossover" research may meet professional motivations of all participants. In addition to CTA and RTTA, our approach is partly informed by the Human Practices approach, as well as by experiences of functional integration of participating research disciplines in systems biology in general. In our ongoing project, Crossover Research, we found a basis for research integration within zones of overlapping professional interests. The research integration of socio-humanist fields in particular finds its rationale in the zones where epistemic and ethico-political problems and concerns intersect and crossover.
机译：综合研究将纪律带入新的努力。系统生物学目前通过自然科学学科的综合研究活动出现。我们的项目，交叉研究，扩大了包括哲学的这一整合范围。本章讨论了我们扩大纪律调色板的动机，并反映了这种延伸的条件，以基于我们的初步经验。参与学科的功能整合是系统生物学的一般挑战。我们建议哲学（或任何社会人文纪律）可以与其他系统生物学领域的任何其他贡献领域相同。整合哲学研究的挑战不需要是不同的。融合主导现有方法表达的社会人文主义学科的理由偏向了人文主义的专业利益。我们通过讨论CTA和RTTA的方法来辩论这种情况。然后，我们清楚地表达了我们自己的尝试，“交叉”研究可能会符合所有参与者的专业动机。除了CTA和RTTA之外，我们的方法是由人类实践方法部分通知的，以及通过在系统生物学中参与研究学科的功能整合的经验。在我们正在进行的项目中，交叉研究，我们在重叠专业利益区域内找到了研究整合的基础。社会人文领域的研究整合尤其在认知和伦理 - 政治问题和关注交叉和交叉的区域中发现了其基本原理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号