• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Conference on head- and helmet-mounted displays >The reported incidence of man-machine interface issues in Army aviators using the Aviator's Night Vision System (ANVIS) in a combat theatre
【24h】

The reported incidence of man-machine interface issues in Army aviators using the Aviator's Night Vision System (ANVIS) in a combat theatre

机译：在战斗剧院中使用飞行员的夜视系统（ANVIS）在军队飞行员中的人机界面问题发生率

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Army Aviators rely on the ANVIS for night operations. Human factors literature notes that the ANVIS man-machine interface results in reports of visual and spinal complaints. This is the first study that has looked at these issues in the much harsher combat environment. Last year, the authors reported on the statistically significant (p<0.01) increased complaints of visual discomfort, degraded visual cues, and incidence of static and dynamic visual illusions in the combat environment [Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7688, 76880G (2010)]. In this paper we present the findings regarding increased spinal complaints and other man-machine interface issues found in the combat environment. Methods: A survey was administered to Aircrew deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Results: 82 Aircrew (representing an aggregate of >89,000 flight hours of which >22,000 were with ANVIS) participated. Analysis demonstrated high complaints of almost all levels of back and neck pain. Additionally, the use of body armor and other Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE) caused significant ergonomic complaints when used with ANVIS. Conclusions: ANVIS use in a combat environment resulted in higher and different types of reports of spinal symptoms and other man-machine interface issues over what was previously reported. Data from this study may be more operationally relevant than that of the peacetime literature as it is derived from actual combat and not from training flights, and it may have important implications about making combat predictions based on performance in training scenarios. Notably, Aircrew remarked that they could not execute the mission without ANVIS and ALSE and accepted the degraded ergonomic environment
机译：背景：军队飞行员依赖于夜间运营的anvis。人为因素文献指出，ANVIS人机界面导致了视觉和脊柱投诉的报道。这是第一项研究，这些研究已经在骚扰战斗环境中寻找这些问题。去年，作者报告了统计上显着的（P <0.01）增加了视觉不适，降级的视觉线索和战斗环境中静态和动态视觉幻觉的发病率的抱怨[proc。斯佩里，卷。 7688,76880G（2010）]。在本文中，我们介绍了关于增加战斗环境中发现的脊柱投诉和其他人机界面问题的调查结果。方法：向持久自由（OEF）的运营支撑部署的机组人员的调查。结果：82个机组人员（代表> 22,000的飞行时间> 89,000个飞行时间有ANVIS）参加。分析表现出几乎所有水平的背部和颈部疼痛的高投诉。此外，在与ANVIS一起使用时，使用身体护甲和其他航空寿命支持设备（ALSE）引起了显着的人体工程学抱怨。结论：ANVIS在战斗环境中使用，导致脊柱症状和其他人机界面的报告更高，不同的人机界面问题上文报道的内容。来自该研究的数据可能比平时文学更为操作，因为它来自实际战斗而不是培训航班，可能对基于培训方案的性能进行战斗预测可能具有重要意义。值得注意的是，机组螺旋注意到他们无法在没有亚太士和ALSE的情况下执行任务，并接受降级的人体工程学环境

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号