• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Head- and helmet-mounted displays XVI: design and applications >The reported incidence of man-machine interface issues in Army aviators using the Aviator's Night Vision System (ANVIS) in a combat theatre
【24h】

The reported incidence of man-machine interface issues in Army aviators using the Aviator's Night Vision System (ANVIS) in a combat theatre

机译：据报道，在战场上使用飞行员的夜视系统（ANVIS）的飞行员中人机界面问题的发生率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Army Aviators rely on the ANVIS for night operations. Human factors literature notes that the ANVIS man-machine interface results in reports of visual and spinal complaints. This is the first study that has looked at these issues in the much harsher combat environment. Last year, the authors reported on the statistically significant (p<0.01) increased complaints of visual discomfort, degraded visual cues, and incidence of static and dynamic visual illusions in the combat environment [Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7688, 76880G (2010)]. In this paper we present the findings regarding increased spinal complaints and other man-machine interface issues found in the combat environment. Methods: A survey was administered to Aircrew deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). Results: 82 Aircrew (representing an aggregate of >89,000 flight hours of which >22,000 were with ANVIS) participated. Analysis demonstrated high complaints of almost all levels of back and neck pain. Additionally, the use of body armor and other Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE) caused significant ergonomic complaints when used with ANVIS. Conclusions: ANVIS use in a combat environment resulted in higher and different types of reports of spinal symptoms and other man-machine interface issues over what was previously reported. Data from this study may be more operationally relevant than that of the peacetime literature as it is derived from actual combat and not from training flights, and it may have important implications about making combat predictions based on performance in training scenarios. Notably, Aircrew remarked that they could not execute the mission without ANVIS and ALSE and accepted the degraded ergonomic environment
机译：背景：陆军飞行员依靠ANVIS进行夜间行动。人为因素的文献指出，ANVIS人机界面可导致视觉和脊柱不适的报告。这是在更为恶劣的战斗环境中研究这些问题的第一项研究。去年，这组作者报告说，在战斗环境中，视觉不适，视觉提示降低以及静态和动态视觉幻觉的发生率在统计上有统计学意义（p <0.01）上升[Proc。 SPIE，第7688，76880G（2010）。在本文中，我们介绍了有关在战斗环境中发现的脊柱不适和其他人机界面问题的发现。方法：对支持“持久自由行动”（OEF）部署的机组人员进行了调查。结果：82名机组人员（总计> 89,000飞行小时，其中> 22,000为ANVIS）。分析表明，几乎所有程度的背部和颈部疼痛症状都很高。此外，与ANVIS一起使用时，防弹衣和其他航空生命支持设备（ALSE）的使用引起了明显的人体工程学投诉。结论：在战斗环境中使用ANVIS导致的脊柱症状报告和其他人机界面问题的报告类型比以前报告的更多和不同。该研究的数据可能比平时的文献在操作上更具相关性，因为它们是从实际战斗中而不是从训练飞行中获得的，并且可能对根据训练场景中的表现进行战斗预测具有重要意义。值得注意的是，机组人员表示，如果没有ANVIS和ALSE，他们将无法执行任务，并接受了退化的人体工程学环境

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号