• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Aunual Mary Kay O Connor Process Safety Center International Symposium >Villains, Victims, and Heroes: Accounting for the Roles Human Activity Plays in LOPA Scenarios
【24h】

Villains, Victims, and Heroes: Accounting for the Roles Human Activity Plays in LOPA Scenarios

机译：恶棍，受害者和英雄：核对人类活动在洛卡情景中扮演的角色

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When a team is analyzing a LOPA scenario, the team needs to consider all three roles played by human interaction in the scenario: that of cause, as a result of human error; that of receptor, both in terms of safety impacts (inside the fence line) and community impacts (outside the fence line); and that of independent layers of protection (IPL), considering both administrative controls and human responses. Frequently, the nature of these three roles are inter-related, and setting guidance that is internally consistent is important to using LOPA to assess risk rather than as a means to game the analyses to simply achieve a wished-for result. A number of criteria have been proposed to quantify human involvement, typically as cause, as receptor, or as IPL. Establishing a framework to look at all three in a unified way is more likely to result in analyses that are consistent from scenario to scenario. This paper describes such a framework and presents it in a way that allows organizations to review their own criteria for quantifying human involvement in LOPA. It also examines some of the published LOPA criteria for human involvement and looks at it in terms of consistency of approach between evaluation of cause, receptor, and IPL. Finally the paper makes suggestions to use in calibrating LOPA methodologies to achieve consistent and believable results in terms of human interaction within and between scenarios that have worked for other organizations.
机译：当一支球队正在分析洛帕情景时，该团队需要考虑在情景中的人类互动中扮演的所有三个角色：由于人为错误，原因;在安全影响（围栏线内）和社区影响（围栏线外）方面，这两者都是受体的。以及考虑行政控制和人为反应的独立保护层（IPL）。通常，这三个角色的性质是相关的，并且在内部一致的设定指导对于使用洛卡来评估风险而言是重要的，而不是作为游戏分析的手段，以便简单地实现生成的效果。已经提出了许多标准来量化人类参与，通常是原因，作为受体，或作为IPL。建立一个以统一的方式查看所有三个的框架更有可能导致与情景的方案一致的分析。本文介绍了这样一个框架，并以允许组织审查他们自己的标准来审查他们在洛卡中的人类参与的标准。它还探讨了一些已发表的人类参与的洛卡标准，并根据原因，受体和IPL评估之间的方法的一致性来看待它。最后，该论文提出了用于校准洛杉矶方法，以达到为其他组织工作的人类互动而在人类互动方面实现一致和可信的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号