首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Veterinary and Animal Ethics >Debate: '/s It Better to Have Lived and Lost than Never to Have Lived at All?'
【24h】

Debate: '/s It Better to Have Lived and Lost than Never to Have Lived at All?'

机译:辩论:'/ S比永远活着更好的生活和失去了吗?“

获取原文

摘要

Banner's principles of animal ethics mix the approaches of duties and consequences. This pragmatic solution is often used when humans have to make difficult moral choices about the treatment of animals in our care. Often we have to weigh up issues relating to an animal's quality and quantity of life. This balance lies at the heart of the moral - as well as the welfare - debate. During this debate, registrants considered a question, which can be interpreted variously, for example in terms of moral principles, specific issues such as population control or illustrative examples. The question was considered by James Kirkwood, Bernard Rollin and James Yeates before registrants were invited to speak.
机译:横幅的动物伦理原则将职责和后果的方法混合在一起。当人类必须在我们的照顾中对动物进行困难的道德选择时,通常使用这种务实的解决方案。我们通常必须称重与动物的质量和生活量有关的问题。这种余额在于道德的核心 - 以及福利 - 辩论。在此辩论期间,注册人被审议了一个问题,例如可以在道德原则方面进行各种解释,例如人口控制或说明性示例等具体问题。詹姆斯·克里克伍德,伯纳德·罗克伍德和詹姆斯助理邀请登记商发言前审议了这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号