• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Veterinary and Animal Ethics >Veterinary Ethics and Law
【24h】

Veterinary Ethics and Law

机译：兽医伦理法律

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper addresses the governance of veterinary practice. I argue that the existing self-regulatory framework is outdated and contrasts sharply with the close legal governance of the practice of human medicine. Specifically, I contend that the current regime is too reactive and that mechanisms for dealing with complaints raise concerns about the independence and transparency of decision-making. Furthermore, the limited options open to the disciplinary committee, and the limited rights of appeal forthose subject to complaints give rise to further concern. In short, the current model, established 45 years ago, continues to display all the traditional shortcomings of the self-regulatory paradigm. For dissatisfied clients, the only alternative is litigation on the basis of either professional negligence or breach of contract, but there are formidable obstacles to success in litigation. I conclude that the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 is no longer fit for regulatory purpose and that, notwithstandingvarious practical and economic barriers to reform, the veterinary profession should heed the lessons of human medicine and take the initiative in promoting legislative change. While the regulatory body, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, favours legislative reform, there seems little political will for new legislation. However, unless this occurs there is a real risk that future reforms will be forced upon the profession in response to scandal or breaches of human rights, which will do nothing topromote public trust and confidence in the veterinary profession.
机译：本文涉及兽医实践的治理。我认为现行的自我监管框架已经过时，与人类医学实践的密切法律治理急剧上略高。具体而言，我认为当前的制度过于反应，并且处理投诉的机制提出了关于决策的独立性和透明度的担忧。此外，对纪律委员会开放有限的选择，并提出对投诉的有限权利产生进一步关注。简而言之，在45年前建立的当前模式继续展示自我监管范式的所有传统缺点。对于不满意的客户来说，唯一的替代方案是诉讼，即履行职业疏忽或违反合同，但诉讼成功存在巨大障碍。我得出结论，1966年兽医外科医生法案不再适合监管目的，而且，改革的历史实际和经济障碍，兽医专业应该注意人类医学的课程，并主动促进立法变革。虽然监管机构，皇家兽医皇家外科医院，有利于立法改革，似乎对新立法的政治意愿很少。但是，除非这发生这种情况，否则有一个真正的风险，即未来的改革将被迫在诽谤或违反人权的诽谤或违反人权的情况下，这将不做任何顶级公共信任和对兽医专业的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号